Austin Peay

22-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

56.5%Austin Peay

43.5%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -1.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.4

MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -130

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAustin Peay 78

Projected Total155.4

Projected ScoreLipscomb 77

Team Comparison

Austin PeayMetricLipscomb

54.8MMH Power Index47.9

115.0Offensive Efficiency111.3

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.6

11.9Net Efficiency3.7

-5.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

71.0Tempo68.8

53.9%Effective FG%54.8%

15.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.0%Free Throw Rate26.5%

8.4Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (115.0–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.6), net efficiency (11.9–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-5.8), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.9).

Final

Austin Peay

60—88

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 28 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Austin PeayTEAM STATLipscomb

22-63FG30-50

35.0%FG%60.0%

10-333PT12-23

30.0%3PT%52.0%

6-9FT16-20

67.0%FT%80.0%

22Rebounds41

7Offensive Rebounds6

10Assists20

7Turnovers12

9Steals5

—Blocks3

16Fouls10

Player Box Score

Austin Peay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Isaac Haney	Guard	36	4-13	3-11	0-0	2	0	1	11
Tate McCubbin	G	28	4-11	3-8	0-0	5	0	2	11
Quan Lax	PG	23	4-7	1-2	2-2	2	1	3	11
Anton Brookshire	PG	34	3-11	2-7	1-2	3	6	0	9
Sai Witt	Forward	10	3-5	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	7
Tekao Carpenter	G	24	1-4	1-4	2-2	1	1	2	5
LJ Thomas	G	17	1-7	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	2
Hansel Enmanuel	PG	13	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2
Daniel Loos	Forward	6	1-1	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	2
Akili Evans	Guard	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0
JaVar Daniel	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Terrell Gaines	PG	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0
Me'Kell Burries	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Ognacevic	F	31	11-12	0-0	9-9	12	1	0	0	31
Will Pruitt	Guard	32	4-9	2-4	4-5	8	2	2	0	14
Joe Anderson	Guard	27	3-8	3-6	0-0	5	8	1	0	9
Miles White	G	15	3-3	3-3	0-0	0	0	0	1	9
Gyasi Powell	Guard	28	3-5	2-4	0-0	2	1	2	1	8
Charlie Williams	C	16	3-6	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	7
Kellan Boylan	F	11	1-2	0-0	2-2	5	2	0	0	4
Grant Asman	F	22	1-2	0-1	1-4	4	4	0	0	3
Ross Candelino	G	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	3
Logan Suber	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Luke Carter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zach Lamey	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Ingold	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

90.4Offensive Efficiency132.5

132.5Defensive Efficiency90.4

-42.2Net Efficiency42.2

42.9%Effective FG%72.0%

44.6%True Shooting %73.9%

10.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

14.3%Free Throw Rate40.0%

52.4%3-Point Rate46.0%

1.43Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.