
Tarleton State
14-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.0%Tarleton State
90.0%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -14.2
PROJECTED TOTAL147.2
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -900

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTarleton State 67
Projected Total147.2
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 81
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index59.8
103.2Offensive Efficiency109.2
101.6Defensive Efficiency99.1
1.6Net Efficiency10.1
-2.3Strength of Schedule2.0
-6.7Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
72.2Tempo69.3
49.0%Effective FG%52.1%
19.9%Turnover Rate17.6%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
42.8%Free Throw Rate41.0%
1.1Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.2), defensive efficiency (99.1–101.6), net efficiency (10.1–1.6).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.8–31.2), free throw rate (42.8–41.0).