Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.4%Tulane
77.6%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -346
Temple logo

Temple

16-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 69
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScoreTemple 78

Team Comparison

44.3MMH Power Index50.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.2
109.9Defensive Efficiency107.4
-4.6Net Efficiency4.8
2.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
68.7Tempo65.9
49.6%Effective FG%51.1%
15.6%Turnover Rate13.7%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
44.8%Free Throw Rate42.3%
-3.2Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Temple HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (112.2–105.3), defensive efficiency (107.4–109.9), net efficiency (4.8–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.0), free throw rate (44.8–42.3).
Final
Tulane logo
Tulane
77—80
Temple logo
Temple
Temple by 3 • 65.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATTemple
29-55FG30-53
53.0%FG%57.0%
12-203PT6-16
60.0%3PT%38.0%
7-12FT14-18
58.0%FT%78.0%
20Rebounds33
8Offensive Rebounds12
20Assists12
13Turnovers15
7Steals4
3Blocks8
15Fouls9

Player Box Score

Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Rowan BrumbaughG396-114-74-517500020
Kam WilliamsG345-53-32-222220015
Mari JordanG216-113-50-011000015
Gregg Glenn IIIF335-70-00-255000010
Tyler RinggoldF113-51-21-32000008
Kaleb BanksF293-81-30-04200007
Asher WoodsG251-80-00-01200002
Percy DanielsC70-00-00-01101000
KJ GreeneG10-00-00-00000000
Temple
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jamal Mashburn Jr.Guard3812-163-55-642100032
Shane DezonieGuard323-61-26-833220013
Steve Settle IIIForward305-71-20-041010011
Zion StanfordG265-110-31-242010011
Quante BerryG353-81-30-07202007
Babatunde DurodolaF212-40-02-26111006
Aiden TobiasonG100-10-10-02101000
Matteo PicarelliNot Available50-00-00-00000000
Mohamed KeitaC30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2
118.1Offensive Efficiency122.7
122.7Defensive Efficiency118.1
-4.6Net Efficiency4.6
63.6%Effective FG%62.3%
63.4%True Shooting %65.0%
19.8%Turnover Rate23.2%
21.8%Free Throw Rate34.0%
36.4%3-Point Rate30.2%
1.54Assist / Turnover0.80
Game Summary
Temple won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.