Bowling Green

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.5%Bowling Green

76.5%Miami (OH)

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -8.3

PROJECTED TOTAL163.2

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -326

Miami (OH)

32-2

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBowling Green 77

Projected Total163.2

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 86

Team Comparison

Bowling GreenMetricMiami (OH)

54.7MMH Power Index60.7

112.6Offensive Efficiency123.1

99.1Defensive Efficiency103.7

13.5Net Efficiency19.4

-4.7Strength of Schedule-5.6

1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5

72.2Tempo72.8

53.4%Effective FG%60.6%

15.9%Turnover Rate14.2%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

38.7%Free Throw Rate40.1%

9.8Average Margin14.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–54.7), offensive efficiency (123.1–112.6), net efficiency (19.4–13.5), recent form (5.5–1.4).

Bowling Green COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.1–103.7), strength of schedule (-4.7–-5.6), offensive rebounding (29.2–26.3).

Final

Bowling Green

76—84

Miami (OH)

Miami (OH) by 8 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Bowling GreenTEAM STATMiami (OH)

25-52FG31-58

48.0%FG%53.0%

10-203PT7-23

50.0%3PT%30.0%

16-20FT15-18

80.0%FT%83.0%

24Rebounds33

6Offensive Rebounds8

18Assists14

16Turnovers16

11Steals9

2Blocks3

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

Bowling Green

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Thomas	Guard	39	5-12	3-6	4-5	3	7	1	0	17
Derrick Butler	Guard	38	6-16	4-9	1-2	0	1	3	0	17
Jamai Felt	F	30	6-6	0-0	3-4	5	1	1	1	15
Javontae Campbell	G	30	3-5	0-0	8-8	4	3	3	1	14
Marcus Johnson	F	38	4-11	3-5	0-0	6	4	2	0	11
Wilguens Jr. Exacte	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-1	1	1	0	0	2
DaJion Humphrey	G	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Braelon Green	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Preston Squire	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mekhi Cooper	G	29	5-8	2-3	2-2	2	2	1	0	14
Kam Craft	G	22	5-8	1-2	2-2	3	1	0	0	13
Brant Byers	G	20	4-10	1-6	3-4	1	1	1	0	12
Peter Suder	G	24	4-7	2-4	1-2	3	2	1	0	11
Antwone Woolfolk	F	23	4-8	0-1	3-4	7	2	0	3	11
Eian Elmer	G	36	5-11	0-5	0-0	5	2	4	0	10
Reece Potter	F	17	4-6	1-2	0-0	5	1	0	0	9
Evan Ipsaro	G	23	0-0	0-0	4-4	4	2	2	0	4
Luke Skaljac	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

104.0Offensive Efficiency114.9

114.9Defensive Efficiency104.0

-10.9Net Efficiency10.9

57.7%Effective FG%59.5%

61.8%True Shooting %63.1%

22.4%Turnover Rate21.5%

38.5%Free Throw Rate31.0%

38.5%3-Point Rate39.7%

1.13Assist / Turnover0.88

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.