Furman logo

Furman

22-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
90.5%Furman
9.5%VMI
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -13.5
PROJECTED TOTAL148.6
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -953
VMI logo

VMI

5-26
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFurman 81
Projected Total148.6
Projected ScoreVMI 68

Team Comparison

FurmanMetricVMI
53.9MMH Power Index29.1
113.3Offensive Efficiency105.1
105.1Defensive Efficiency117.4
8.2Net Efficiency-12.3
-1.8Strength of Schedule-5.4
4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-21.9
67.4Tempo66.2
55.4%Effective FG%48.9%
17.7%Turnover Rate14.7%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %26.4%
32.6%Free Throw Rate29.9%
5.5Average Margin-8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.1–117.4), net efficiency (8.2–-12.3).
VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–17.7).
Final
Furman logo
Furman
82—91
VMI logo
VMI
VMI by 9 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

FurmanTEAM STATVMI
26-70FG29-56
37.0%FG%52.0%
16-443PT9-22
36.0%3PT%41.0%
14-18FT24-27
78.0%FT%89.0%
45Rebounds29
20Offensive Rebounds5
20Assists12
11Turnovers7
3Steals8
2Blocks5
22Fouls15

Player Box Score

Furman
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
PJay Smith Jr.Guard306-136-110-044000018
Charles JohnstonF286-125-101-2114100018
Ben Vander WalF285-90-05-6123000015
Nick AndersonGuard331-91-95-62300008
Davis MolnarF182-31-13-44110008
Cooper BowserF112-40-00-00102004
Eddrin BronsonG231-71-50-02200003
Tom HouseG131-41-30-01000003
Mason SmithF91-61-50-04200003
Garrett HienForward71-30-00-03010002
VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Augustinas KiudulasF335-122-310-1162110022
Rickey Bradley Jr.G366-101-26-643100019
TJ JohnsonF304-124-120-031000012
Tan YildizogluG325-80-21-154100011
Linus HolmstromG253-42-32-242100010
Jaylen PazonG133-40-01-24000007
AJ ClarkG232-40-02-33043006
Kaden StuckeyF81-20-02-20001004

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2
116.8Offensive Efficiency129.6
129.6Defensive Efficiency116.8
-12.8Net Efficiency12.8
48.6%Effective FG%59.8%
52.2%True Shooting %66.1%
15.8%Turnover Rate9.9%
25.7%Free Throw Rate48.2%
62.9%3-Point Rate39.3%
1.82Assist / Turnover1.71
Game Summary
VMI won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.