Syracuse

15-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.3%Syracuse

79.7%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -393

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSyracuse 66

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreClemson 76

Team Comparison

SyracuseMetricClemson

52.2MMH Power Index59.9

109.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

106.6Defensive Efficiency101.4

2.6Net Efficiency11.2

5.6Strength of Schedule4.6

-15.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.0Tempo63.6

52.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.6%Turnover Rate14.0%

29.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

36.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

1.8Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–106.6), net efficiency (11.2–2.6).

Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–4.6), offensive rebounding (29.0–27.0).

Final

Syracuse

72—86

Clemson

Clemson by 14 • 64.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SyracuseTEAM STATClemson

28-52FG31-55

54.0%FG%56.0%

11-213PT9-20

52.0%3PT%45.0%

5-6FT15-21

83.0%FT%71.0%

24Rebounds28

5Offensive Rebounds8

8Assists17

14Turnovers7

4Steals10

2Blocks2

16Fouls7

Player Box Score

Syracuse

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
J.J. Starling	G	32	10-16	5-10	0-0	1	0	0	0	25
Eddie Lampkin Jr.	Center	34	7-12	0-1	0-1	9	1	0	0	14
Kyle Cuffe Jr.	G	15	2-5	2-2	3-3	1	0	0	0	9
Jaquan Carlos	Guard	20	3-5	1-1	0-0	0	3	1	0	7
Jyare Davis	Forward	25	2-6	2-4	0-0	5	1	2	1	6
Lucas Taylor	Guard	24	1-3	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	0	4
Chris Bell	F	18	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Elijah Moore	G	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	3	1	0	3
Petar Majstorovic	F	21	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Hunter	Guard	35	7-13	4-7	5-6	1	1	3	0	23
Viktor Lakhin	Center	32	6-11	2-4	2-6	10	2	0	2	16
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	38	4-9	0-2	6-7	1	5	2	0	14
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	37	5-9	1-2	0-0	5	4	0	0	11
Del Jones	G	15	3-3	1-1	2-2	4	2	1	0	9
Chauncey Wiggins	F	18	3-5	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	7
Jake Heidbreder	G	23	3-5	0-2	0-0	3	1	2	0	6
Christian Reeves	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.0Possessions64.0

112.5Offensive Efficiency134.4

134.4Defensive Efficiency112.5

-21.9Net Efficiency21.9

64.4%Effective FG%64.5%

65.6%True Shooting %66.2%

21.9%Turnover Rate10.9%

11.5%Free Throw Rate38.2%

40.4%3-Point Rate36.4%

0.57Assist / Turnover2.43

Game Summary

Clemson won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 64.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.