Hampton

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.6%Hampton

84.4%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -11.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.8

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -541

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHampton 71

Projected Total152.8

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 82

Team Comparison

HamptonMetricWilliam & Mary

43.2MMH Power Index53.8

104.3Offensive Efficiency112.5

105.6Defensive Efficiency105.2

-1.3Net Efficiency7.3

-1.7Strength of Schedule-1.5

-12.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

67.0Tempo73.9

47.3%Effective FG%55.3%

16.7%Turnover Rate16.4%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

39.3%Free Throw Rate45.3%

-0.8Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–43.2), offensive efficiency (112.5–104.3), defensive efficiency (105.2–105.6), net efficiency (7.3–-1.3).

Hampton COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.3–26.7).

Final

Hampton

83—94

William & Mary

William & Mary by 11 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HamptonTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

27-58FG27-54

47.0%FG%50.0%

7-213PT11-27

33.0%3PT%41.0%

22-32FT29-35

69.0%FT%83.0%

29Rebounds38

9Offensive Rebounds11

8Assists19

13Turnovers15

10Steals6

1Blocks—

28Fouls25

Player Box Score

Hampton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
George Beale Jr.	G	24	7-13	2-4	3-4	1	0	0	0	19
Xzavier Long	F	37	3-6	0-1	8-13	9	3	2	1	14
Trevor Smith	G	22	3-5	2-3	3-7	1	1	1	0	11
Noah Farrakhan	Guard	19	3-8	1-3	2-2	0	0	1	0	9
Tyler Rice	Guard	21	3-5	1-3	0-0	1	2	2	0	7
Daniel Johnson	G	20	2-7	0-2	2-2	1	0	2	0	6
Richard Goods	F	21	2-3	0-0	1-1	10	0	2	0	5
Wayne Bristol Jr.	Guard	12	1-4	1-3	2-2	1	1	0	0	5
Eunique Rink	F	6	2-2	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	5
Elijah Kennedy	G	8	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Dan Banister Jr.	Guard	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Kyrese Mullen	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	27	8-11	7-10	7-8	7	1	0	30
Noah Collier	F	25	7-10	0-0	2-4	6	1	2	16
Keller Boothby	Forward	29	3-6	1-3	5-7	7	1	0	12
Matteus Case	Guard	29	3-6	1-2	5-6	4	6	3	12
Kyle Frazier	G	13	1-3	1-3	4-4	1	0	0	7
Isaiah Mbeng	G	23	1-5	0-3	2-2	2	5	0	4
Kyle Pulliam	G	22	1-5	0-2	2-2	3	3	0	4
Malachi Ndur	Forward	18	1-4	0-2	2-2	3	1	1	4
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	10	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	3
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9

109.4Offensive Efficiency123.8

123.8Defensive Efficiency109.4

-14.5Net Efficiency14.5

52.6%Effective FG%60.2%

56.7%True Shooting %66.5%

16.8%Turnover Rate20.1%

55.2%Free Throw Rate64.8%

36.2%3-Point Rate50.0%

0.62Assist / Turnover1.27

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.