
Delaware
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.3%Delaware
93.7%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -18.8
PROJECTED TOTAL142.0
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -1487

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDelaware 62
Projected Total142.0
Projected ScoreHofstra 80
Team Comparison
39.7MMH Power Index59.3
103.3Offensive Efficiency114.0
112.9Defensive Efficiency100.9
-9.6Net Efficiency13.1
3.4Strength of Schedule-2.9
-9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
65.5Tempo66.2
52.9%Effective FG%52.2%
18.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
20.5%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
31.2%Free Throw Rate32.0%
-6.3Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–39.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.9), net efficiency (13.1–-9.6).
Delaware COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2).