Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.9%Lipscomb

28.1%North Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -6.1

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -256

North Alabama

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 78

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 72

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricNorth Alabama

47.9MMH Power Index34.9

111.3Offensive Efficiency104.4

107.6Defensive Efficiency116.7

3.7Net Efficiency-12.3

-2.5Strength of Schedule-1.2

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3

68.8Tempo66.5

54.8%Effective FG%48.9%

16.0%Turnover Rate17.2%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %31.5%

26.5%Free Throw Rate39.1%

2.5Average Margin-8.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (111.3–104.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–116.7), net efficiency (3.7–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.9), free throw rate (39.1–26.5).

Final

Lipscomb

64—74

North Alabama

North Alabama by 10 • 60.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATNorth Alabama

23-55FG28-59

42.0%FG%47.0%

7-283PT8-22

25.0%3PT%36.0%

11-14FT10-14

79.0%FT%71.0%

26Rebounds41

7Offensive Rebounds15

10Assists12

7Turnovers9

5Steals7

1Blocks2

11Fouls12

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joe Anderson	Guard	36	9-13	2-5	1-2	2	4	3	0	21
Gyasi Powell	Guard	35	5-11	4-10	2-3	1	1	1	0	16
Jacob Ognacevic	F	35	4-12	1-3	6-7	4	1	0	0	15
Will Pruitt	Guard	35	4-9	0-4	2-2	5	0	0	0	10
Charlie Williams	C	15	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	2
Grant Asman	F	18	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	1	1	1	0
Miles White	G	14	0-3	0-2	0-0	4	1	0	0	0
Ross Candelino	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kellan Boylan	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Logan Suber	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacari Lane	G	36	6-12	3-8	3-4	4	6	0	0	18
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	29	4-12	4-8	0-0	2	1	3	0	12
Corneilous Williams	F	34	5-8	0-0	1-2	14	0	2	0	11
Will Soucie	Guard	30	4-8	0-1	3-4	5	2	0	0	11
Taye Fields	Guard	31	3-6	0-1	3-4	8	2	2	1	9
Canin Jefferson	G	15	3-6	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	7
Donte Bacchus	F	19	2-4	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	4
DarKaun King	F	6	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

60.7Possessions60.7

105.4Offensive Efficiency121.9

121.9Defensive Efficiency105.4

-16.5Net Efficiency16.5

48.2%Effective FG%54.2%

51.9%True Shooting %56.4%

11.4%Turnover Rate15.1%

25.5%Free Throw Rate23.7%

50.9%3-Point Rate37.3%

1.43Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

North Alabama won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 60.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.