
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
83.6%Grand Canyon
16.4%Southern Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -510

Southern Utah
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 81
Projected Total152.1
Projected ScoreSouthern Utah 71
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index40.6
109.2Offensive Efficiency105.6
99.1Defensive Efficiency110.0
10.1Net Efficiency-4.4
2.0Strength of Schedule-3.0
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.3
69.3Tempo72.3
52.1%Effective FG%52.6%
17.6%Turnover Rate19.6%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
41.0%Free Throw Rate34.4%
7.0Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–40.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–105.6), defensive efficiency (99.1–110.0), net efficiency (10.1–-4.4).
Southern Utah COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–52.1).