Seton Hall logo

Seton Hall

21-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.4%Seton Hall
44.6%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeton Hall -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINESeton Hall -124
Creighton logo

Creighton

15-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 72
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreCreighton 71

Team Comparison

57.1MMH Power Index50.6
105.8Offensive Efficiency109.0
98.3Defensive Efficiency109.5
7.5Net Efficiency-0.5
3.5Strength of Schedule5.1
0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
66.5Tempo68.9
47.9%Effective FG%53.0%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.6%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
35.7%Free Throw Rate29.0%
5.0Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Seton Hall HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSeton Hall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–50.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–109.5), net efficiency (7.5–-0.5), recent form (0.6–-5.2).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.0–105.8), strength of schedule (5.1–3.5), shooting efficiency (53.0–47.9).
Final
Seton Hall logo
Seton Hall
54—79
Creighton logo
Creighton
Creighton by 25 • 63.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Seton HallTEAM STATCreighton
23-54FG28-48
43.0%FG%58.0%
3-93PT11-26
33.0%3PT%42.0%
5-6FT12-17
83.0%FT%71.0%
26Rebounds29
6Offensive Rebounds4
9Assists19
11Turnovers12
9Steals5
2Blocks6
17Fouls9

Player Box Score

Seton Hall
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Prince AligbeF296-80-00-010010012
Garwey DualG384-100-22-245300010
Emmanuel OkoraforF173-40-02-24000008
Scotty MiddletonF293-91-30-03011007
Jahseem FeltonG272-111-20-04000005
David TubekF152-30-11-22120005
Dylan Addae-WusuGuard152-21-10-01130005
Godswill ErherieneC151-40-00-03000002
Yacine ToumiF150-30-00-01200000
Creighton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan KalkbrennerCenter319-100-15-793230023
Steven AshworthGuard336-95-80-029000017
Isaac TraudtF194-42-20-120000010
Fedor ZugicGuard173-52-41-22200009
Jasen GreenF202-41-20-04110005
Jackson McAndrewF172-71-60-02100005
Jamiya NealGuard271-50-21-11111003
Mason MillerF130-10-12-20200002
Fred KingC90-10-02-22001002
Ty DavisG71-10-00-01010002
Sami OsmaniGuard20-10-01-22000001
Shane ThomasG40-00-00-00001000
Josh Townley-ThomasF10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

63.0Possessions63.0
85.7Offensive Efficiency125.4
125.4Defensive Efficiency85.7
-39.7Net Efficiency39.7
45.4%Effective FG%69.8%
47.5%True Shooting %70.4%
17.8%Turnover Rate18.7%
11.1%Free Throw Rate35.4%
16.7%3-Point Rate54.2%
0.82Assist / Turnover1.58
Game Summary
Creighton won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 63.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.