Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.3%Lipscomb

76.7%Central Arkansas

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCentral Arkansas -8.4

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINECentral Arkansas -329

Central Arkansas

22-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 74

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 82

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricCentral Arkansas

47.9MMH Power Index54

111.3Offensive Efficiency113.9

107.6Defensive Efficiency105.2

3.7Net Efficiency8.7

-2.5Strength of Schedule-3.9

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency9.8

68.8Tempo71.0

54.8%Effective FG%54.3%

16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%

2.5Average Margin6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Central Arkansas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Arkansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–47.9), offensive efficiency (113.9–111.3), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.6), net efficiency (8.7–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-3.9), shooting efficiency (54.8–54.3).

Final

Lipscomb

68—55

Central Arkansas

Lipscomb by 13 • 64.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATCentral Arkansas

23-56FG21-53

41.0%FG%40.0%

6-343PT7-28

18.0%3PT%25.0%

16-21FT6-14

76.0%FT%43.0%

34Rebounds36

9Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists10

9Turnovers13

11Steals8

3Blocks—

13Fouls17

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Pruitt	Guard	36	7-13	1-6	3-6	5	2	1	0	18
Joe Anderson	Guard	34	6-13	4-10	1-2	2	3	7	0	17
Jacob Ognacevic	F	35	4-7	1-3	5-5	11	1	0	0	14
Kellan Boylan	F	11	1-1	0-0	5-6	0	0	0	0	7
Gyasi Powell	Guard	36	2-11	0-8	0-0	4	2	3	0	4
Grant Asman	F	25	2-5	0-3	0-0	5	1	0	2	4
Charlie Williams	C	10	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	2
Miles White	G	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Ross Candelino	G	5	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Central Arkansas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Elias Cato	Forward	29	6-10	2-4	3-4	5	1	1	17
Cole McCormick	F	29	5-10	2-6	1-2	3	0	1	13
Brayden Fagbemi	G	37	5-20	2-13	0-0	6	4	2	12
Nehemiah Turner	F	20	3-3	0-0	2-6	5	0	1	8
Diogo Seixas	Forward	10	1-2	1-1	0-2	3	2	0	3
Mike Evbagharu	G	32	1-4	0-1	0-0	7	1	0	2
Ben Fox	Guard	34	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	0	2	0
Ethan Thomas	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0
Ubong-Abasi Etim	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.4Possessions64.4

105.6Offensive Efficiency85.4

85.4Defensive Efficiency105.6

20.2Net Efficiency-20.2

46.4%Effective FG%46.2%

51.5%True Shooting %46.1%

13.6%Turnover Rate20.8%

37.5%Free Throw Rate26.4%

60.7%3-Point Rate52.8%

1.11Assist / Turnover0.77

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 64.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.