Rider

4-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.0%Rider

95.0%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -20.6

PROJECTED TOTAL143.8

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1900

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRider 62

Projected Total143.8

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 82

Team Comparison

RiderMetricQuinnipiac

29.1MMH Power Index51

96.3Offensive Efficiency106.8

115.3Defensive Efficiency102.1

-19.0Net Efficiency4.7

-0.9Strength of Schedule-2.3

-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

65.9Tempo70.5

43.4%Effective FG%48.9%

17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.8%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

31.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-12.6Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–115.3), net efficiency (4.7–-19.0).

Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-2.3).

Final

Rider

64—75

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 11 • 67.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiderTEAM STATQuinnipiac

22-58FG28-59

38.0%FG%47.0%

4-123PT8-22

33.0%3PT%36.0%

16-24FT11-19

67.0%FT%58.0%

37Rebounds37

12Offensive Rebounds9

14Assists19

10Turnovers9

7Steals8

7Blocks3

14Fouls17

Player Box Score

Rider

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tariq Ingraham	F	31	6-10	0-0	3-6	14	3	2	3	15
Jay Alvarez	Forward	34	4-8	0-0	6-8	5	0	0	0	14
T.J. Weeks Jr.	Guard	37	5-15	2-7	1-2	8	1	2	1	13
Zion Cruz	G	27	3-10	2-2	2-2	1	2	1	0	10
Ruben Rodriguez Jr.	G	30	1-7	0-2	2-2	4	5	1	0	4
Stephen Byard	F	11	2-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2	4
Flash Burton	G	18	0-2	0-0	2-4	2	1	0	1	2
Andre Young	Guard	10	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	2	1	0	2
Alaaeddine Boutayeb	Center	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zocko Littleton Jr.	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	35	6-11	2-4	5-8	12	1	3	2	19
Ryan Mabrey	G	15	4-6	4-6	0-0	0	1	0	0	12
Khaden Bennett	G	33	3-6	1-3	4-5	10	4	1	0	11
Paul Otieno	F	27	4-9	0-1	0-1	6	3	0	0	8
Jaden Zimmerman	G	16	3-8	0-1	2-4	0	0	2	1	8
Alexis Reyes	Forward	34	3-8	0-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	6
Savion Lewis	Guard	22	3-4	0-0	0-1	2	7	1	0	6
Doug Young	G	6	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Richie Springs	Forward	6	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Grant Randall	F	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.7Possessions67.7

94.5Offensive Efficiency110.8

110.8Defensive Efficiency94.5

-16.2Net Efficiency16.2

41.4%Effective FG%54.2%

46.1%True Shooting %55.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.2%

41.4%Free Throw Rate32.2%

20.7%3-Point Rate37.3%

1.40Assist / Turnover2.11

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 67.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.