Tulane

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.5%Tulane

64.5%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -5.3

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINERice -182

Rice

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTulane 72

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreRice 78

Team Comparison

TulaneMetricRice

44.3MMH Power Index45.1

105.3Offensive Efficiency108.3

109.9Defensive Efficiency109.2

-4.6Net Efficiency-0.9

2.7Strength of Schedule-2.2

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

68.7Tempo68.3

49.6%Effective FG%49.7%

15.6%Turnover Rate17.8%

22.8%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

44.8%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-3.2Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–44.3), offensive efficiency (108.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (109.2–109.9), net efficiency (-0.9–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.2), ball security (15.6–17.8), free throw rate (44.8–34.7).

Final

Tulane

82—71

Rice

Tulane by 11 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATRice

29-56FG18-64

52.0%FG%28.0%

3-143PT10-39

21.0%3PT%26.0%

21-27FT25-33

78.0%FT%76.0%

40Rebounds44

9Offensive Rebounds21

7Assists10

10Turnovers11

8Steals4

6Blocks3

27Fouls23

Player Box Score

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Gregg Glenn III	F	26	7-9	0-1	3-4	6	3	0	1	17
Asher Woods	G	30	4-9	0-1	5-6	2	1	1	0	13
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	35	4-10	1-4	3-5	3	1	2	0	12
Kam Williams	G	36	5-10	1-3	0-1	6	0	2	3	11
Kaleb Banks	F	27	5-11	1-4	0-1	6	0	0	1	11
Mari Jordan	G	15	2-4	0-1	6-6	5	1	0	0	10
Percy Daniels	C	11	1-1	0-0	2-2	4	0	2	1	4
Tyler Ringgold	F	13	0-0	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	0	2
KJ Greene	G	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Denver Anglin	G	27	7-12	6-9	7-7	0	1	0	0	27
Caden Powell	C	24	4-7	0-0	6-11	11	3	1	0	14
Emory Lanier	Guard	23	3-7	3-5	2-2	5	1	1	1	11
Jacob Dar	G	34	2-15	0-10	6-8	8	1	2	1	10
Aaron Powell	G	20	2-8	1-5	2-2	5	1	0	0	7
Trae Broadnax	G	23	0-7	0-4	2-2	4	3	0	1	2
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	19	0-6	0-5	0-1	2	0	0	0	0
Andrew Akuchie	F	14	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Kellen Amos	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

117.5Offensive Efficiency101.7

101.7Defensive Efficiency117.5

15.8Net Efficiency-15.8

54.5%Effective FG%35.9%

59.6%True Shooting %44.6%

14.3%Turnover Rate15.8%

48.2%Free Throw Rate51.6%

25.0%3-Point Rate60.9%

0.70Assist / Turnover0.91

Game Summary

Tulane won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.