South Carolina Upstate

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

29.2%South Carolina Upstate

70.8%Longwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLongwood -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL151.9

MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -242

Longwood

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina Upstate 73

Projected Total151.9

Projected ScoreLongwood 79

Team Comparison

South Carolina UpstateMetricLongwood

43.6MMH Power Index47

104.5Offensive Efficiency108.1

103.7Defensive Efficiency103.0

0.8Net Efficiency5.1

-3.8Strength of Schedule-6.4

-4.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3

71.1Tempo71.9

50.3%Effective FG%51.4%

17.6%Turnover Rate19.3%

30.1%Offensive Rebound %35.4%

34.0%Free Throw Rate42.0%

0.6Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Longwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–43.6), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.5), defensive efficiency (103.0–103.7), net efficiency (5.1–0.8).

South Carolina Upstate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.8–-6.4), ball security (17.6–19.3).

Final

South Carolina Upstate

54—80

Longwood

Longwood by 26 • 70.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South Carolina UpstateTEAM STATLongwood

20-54FG28-58

37.0%FG%48.0%

6-223PT7-20

27.0%3PT%35.0%

8-16FT17-24

50.0%FT%71.0%

33Rebounds41

9Offensive Rebounds12

14Assists15

19Turnovers12

6Steals11

1Blocks2

22Fouls19

Player Box Score

South Carolina Upstate

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Andrew McConnell	G	29	3-7	2-5	4-5	6	1	2	0	12
Karmani Gregory	G	30	4-10	1-4	2-4	2	2	0	0	11
Carmelo Adkins	G	22	3-5	1-3	0-1	3	2	1	0	7
Nic Book	F	18	3-7	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	6
Mister Dean	G	26	2-7	0-1	1-2	4	4	2	1	5
Chico Johnson	G	20	2-6	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Breylin Garcia	F	17	2-3	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	5
Brit Harris	G	22	1-6	1-4	0-0	1	3	0	0	3
Isaiah Skinner	G	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Daniel Helterhoff	F	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
CJ Rich	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Christmas	Forward	30	6-12	3-8	2-3	4	2	2	0	17
Kyrell Luc	Guard	37	4-5	1-1	6-7	4	4	4	0	15
Colby Garland	G	26	4-6	2-2	2-2	3	8	2	0	12
Jaylen Benard	G	19	5-8	1-4	1-1	2	0	0	0	12
Elijah Tucker	F	26	4-8	0-0	3-6	10	0	2	0	11
Johan Nziemi	F	23	4-9	0-1	3-5	11	0	0	1	11
Angelo Brizzi	G	32	1-10	0-4	0-0	4	1	1	1	2
Leo Nordberg	Guard	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Stark Jones	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.5Possessions70.5

76.6Offensive Efficiency113.5

113.5Defensive Efficiency76.6

-36.9Net Efficiency36.9

42.6%Effective FG%54.3%

43.8%True Shooting %57.6%

26.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.6%Free Throw Rate41.4%

40.7%3-Point Rate34.5%

0.74Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Longwood won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 70.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.