Temple

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

85.4%Temple

14.6%UTSA

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTemple -11.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINETemple -585

UTSA

5-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTemple 80

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreUTSA 69

Team Comparison

TempleMetricUTSA

50.9MMH Power Index30.5

112.2Offensive Efficiency99.0

107.4Defensive Efficiency115.0

4.8Net Efficiency-16.0

-2.0Strength of Schedule-1.2

-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

65.9Tempo70.2

51.1%Effective FG%45.9%

13.7%Turnover Rate17.0%

28.8%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

42.3%Free Throw Rate29.9%

3.2Average Margin-11.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Temple HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–30.5), offensive efficiency (112.2–99.0), defensive efficiency (107.4–115.0), net efficiency (4.8–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.0), offensive rebounding (30.9–28.8).

Final

Temple

79—88

UTSA

UTSA by 9 • 73.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TempleTEAM STATUTSA

25-55FG28-52

45.0%FG%54.0%

5-183PT14-25

28.0%3PT%56.0%

24-35FT18-21

69.0%FT%86.0%

35Rebounds25

13Offensive Rebounds3

9Assists16

16Turnovers14

11Steals10

3Blocks5

19Fouls21

Player Box Score

Temple

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamal Mashburn Jr.	Guard	38	7-14	2-3	4-5	3	0	0	0	20
Steve Settle III	Forward	31	5-10	2-4	6-9	7	1	1	0	18
Zion Stanford	G	27	6-10	0-1	5-7	7	4	1	1	17
Quante Berry	G	35	3-9	0-4	4-4	3	3	3	2	10
Shane Dezonie	Guard	29	3-9	0-3	3-4	6	0	4	0	9
Aiden Tobiason	G	9	1-1	1-1	0-2	2	1	1	0	3
Babatunde Durodola	F	20	0-0	0-0	2-4	2	0	0	0	2
Matteo Picarelli	Not Available	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Mohamed Keita	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Primo Spears	Guard	39	6-15	4-10	4-4	0	3	2	0	20
Raekwon Horton	Forward	36	6-11	2-4	6-7	4	1	2	2	20
Marcus Millender	G	39	6-9	2-2	4-4	2	6	1	0	18
Damari Monsanto	Guard	31	6-9	5-8	0-0	5	3	3	0	17
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	32	3-6	1-1	3-4	10	1	1	2	10
Baboucarr Njie	F	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	1	1	2
David Hermes	F	10	0-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Nazar Mahmoud	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.8Possessions73.8

107.0Offensive Efficiency119.2

119.2Defensive Efficiency107.0

-12.2Net Efficiency12.2

50.0%Effective FG%67.3%

55.1%True Shooting %71.0%

21.4%Turnover Rate19.2%

63.6%Free Throw Rate40.4%

32.7%3-Point Rate48.1%

0.56Assist / Turnover1.14

Game Summary

UTSA won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 73.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.