UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.3%UT Arlington

42.7%Abilene Christian

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL139.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -134

Abilene Christian

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 70

Projected Total139.2

Projected ScoreAbilene Christian 69

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricAbilene Christian

49.6MMH Power Index42.4

102.7Offensive Efficiency101.1

97.9Defensive Efficiency104.1

4.8Net Efficiency-3.0

-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.4

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.3

68.1Tempo69.6

48.5%Effective FG%48.9%

20.4%Turnover Rate20.6%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

43.7%Free Throw Rate42.0%

3.3Average Margin-2.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–42.4), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.1), defensive efficiency (97.9–104.1), net efficiency (4.8–-3.0).

Abilene Christian COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (48.9–48.5).

Final

UT Arlington

79—76

Abilene Christian

UT Arlington by 3 • 71.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATAbilene Christian

27-52FG31-71

52.0%FG%44.0%

9-203PT9-20

45.0%3PT%45.0%

16-25FT5-7

64.0%FT%71.0%

35Rebounds37

8Offensive Rebounds15

16Assists13

15Turnovers12

7Steals11

6Blocks1

9Fouls22

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lance Ware	Forward	41	8-8	0-0	2-5	14	2	2	5	18
Raysean Seamster	F	41	6-9	0-0	4-10	6	1	2	1	16
Jaden Wells	Guard	33	5-12	4-10	2-2	3	0	1	0	16
Brody Robinson	G	41	2-7	2-4	6-6	3	10	0	0	12
Darius Burford	Guard	37	3-8	1-2	0-0	5	2	2	0	7
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	20	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	6
Jaxon Ellingsworth	F	8	1-2	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	4
Diante Smith	Forward	3	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kade Douglas	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Abilene Christian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Quion Williams	G	33	8-11	3-4	0-0	4	2	0	0	19
Leonardo Bettiol	F	32	6-16	0-0	2-2	8	2	3	0	14
Bradyn Hubbard	F	28	5-11	1-2	0-0	7	1	3	0	11
Rich Smith	G	26	4-7	0-0	3-5	3	3	0	0	11
Hunter Jack Madden	Guard	29	3-9	2-6	0-0	0	0	1	0	8
Yaniel Rivera	G	20	2-6	2-6	0-0	3	2	1	0	6
Christian Alston	G	6	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	1	1	3
Jack Sawyer	F	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	2
Ma'Shy Hill	F	5	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Nasir DeGruy	Guard	17	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Dontrez Williams	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Cade Hornecker	F	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.1Possessions71.1

111.1Offensive Efficiency106.9

106.9Defensive Efficiency111.1

4.2Net Efficiency-4.2

60.6%Effective FG%50.0%

61.8%True Shooting %51.1%

21.2%Turnover Rate16.8%

48.1%Free Throw Rate9.9%

38.5%3-Point Rate28.2%

1.07Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 71.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.