Baylor

16-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

76.2%Baylor

23.8%Utah

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBaylor -6.9

PROJECTED TOTAL158.9

MODEL MONEYLINEBaylor -320

Utah

10-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBaylor 83

Projected Total158.9

Projected ScoreUtah 76

Team Comparison

BaylorMetricUtah

58.9MMH Power Index43.9

116.7Offensive Efficiency108.8

109.5Defensive Efficiency115.8

7.2Net Efficiency-7.0

4.0Strength of Schedule5.1

-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3

69.7Tempo68.3

54.4%Effective FG%52.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.7%

37.5%Offensive Rebound %28.8%

34.8%Free Throw Rate32.2%

5.1Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Baylor HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBaylor holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.9–43.9), offensive efficiency (116.7–108.8), defensive efficiency (109.5–115.8), net efficiency (7.2–-7.0).

Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–4.0).

Final

Baylor

76—61

Utah

Baylor by 15 • 62.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BaylorTEAM STATUtah

25-57FG22-55

44.0%FG%40.0%

9-243PT5-23

38.0%3PT%22.0%

17-20FT12-20

85.0%FT%60.0%

39Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds14

12Assists14

11Turnovers11

5Steals8

6Blocks6

21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Baylor

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Norchad Omier	Forward	30	6-9	2-3	8-10	12	2	2	1	22
VJ Edgecombe	Guard	38	8-18	4-6	1-2	6	3	2	2	21
Robert Wright III	G	35	3-11	0-4	8-8	2	3	1	0	14
Jayden Nunn	Guard	38	3-10	1-5	0-0	6	2	0	1	7
Jalen Celestine	G	27	3-7	1-5	0-0	2	1	0	1	7
Jason Asemota	F	9	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Josh Ojianwuna	F	23	1-1	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	1	2

Utah

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ezra Ausar	F	27	7-12	0-1	5-11	7	1	2	2	19
Miro Little	G	28	2-8	2-7	6-6	8	7	3	0	12
Lawson Lovering	Center	23	3-6	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	6
Mason Madsen	Guard	8	2-3	1-1	1-2	3	0	1	0	6
Gabe Madsen	Guard	28	2-10	1-7	0-0	3	2	1	0	5
Jake Wahlin	F	18	2-7	0-2	0-0	6	1	0	0	4
Caleb Lohner	Forward	11	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2	4
Zach Keller	F	4	1-1	1-1	0-1	0	0	0	0	3
Hunter Erickson	G	21	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	3	0	0	2
Keanu Dawes	F	19	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	1	0
Mike Sharavjamts	G	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.0Possessions62.0

122.6Offensive Efficiency98.4

98.4Defensive Efficiency122.6

24.2Net Efficiency-24.2

51.8%Effective FG%44.5%

57.1%True Shooting %47.3%

17.6%Turnover Rate17.9%

35.1%Free Throw Rate36.4%

42.1%3-Point Rate41.8%

1.09Assist / Turnover1.27

Game Summary

Baylor won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 62.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.