
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.3%Merrimack
52.7%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL140.0
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -111

Fairfield
21-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 69
Projected Total140.0
Projected ScoreFairfield 71
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index50.1
106.4Offensive Efficiency109.6
103.2Defensive Efficiency105.4
3.2Net Efficiency4.2
0.7Strength of Schedule-3.4
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
64.4Tempo67.8
49.3%Effective FG%49.1%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
39.5%Free Throw Rate28.4%
2.1Average Margin2.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–50.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–105.4), strength of schedule (0.7–-3.4), recent form (12.9–3.3).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.6–106.4), net efficiency (4.2–3.2), offensive rebounding (36.0–24.7).