Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

89.4%Grambling

10.6%Mississippi Valley State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -14.7

PROJECTED TOTAL144.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -843

Mississippi Valley State

3-30

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 80

Projected Total144.4

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 65

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricMississippi Valley State

41.4MMH Power Index17.7

100.7Offensive Efficiency91.1

100.4Defensive Efficiency117.8

0.3Net Efficiency-26.7

-5.7Strength of Schedule-4.1

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.3

69.9Tempo70.5

49.2%Effective FG%45.8%

20.9%Turnover Rate21.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %26.5%

42.2%Free Throw Rate34.5%

0.2Average Margin-18.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (100.4–117.8), net efficiency (0.3–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-5.7).

Final

Grambling

65—54

Mississippi Valley State

Grambling by 11 • 59.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATMississippi Valley State

21-49FG18-49

43.0%FG%37.0%

10-203PT6-20

50.0%3PT%30.0%

13-21FT12-13

62.0%FT%92.0%

28Rebounds35

7Offensive Rebounds11

11Assists8

7Turnovers15

9Steals2

2Blocks2

13Fouls18

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwan Burnett	G	29	3-9	2-4	4-6	5	4	2	0	12
Emareyon McDonald	Guard	17	4-5	4-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	12
Mikale Stevenson	G	36	3-9	2-3	3-5	3	4	3	0	11
Cbo Newton	G	26	3-7	1-4	2-2	4	0	0	0	9
James Flippin	F	14	4-8	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	9
Ernest Ross	Forward	28	2-5	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	2	5
PJ Eason	F	25	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	0	4
Kintavious Dozier	G	17	0-3	0-2	2-2	2	1	1	0	2
Dupree Fletcher	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Lou Hutchinson	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
P.J. Edwards	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	0	0

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Arthur Tate	Guard	33	6-13	4-7	5-5	6	0	0	0	21
Alvin Stredic	Forward	35	3-6	0-0	5-6	7	0	1	0	11
Daniel Umoh	Center	29	4-4	0-0	0-0	9	1	1	1	8
Donovan Sanders	Guard	34	3-11	1-3	0-0	5	2	0	0	7
Greg Moore Jr.	G	20	2-7	1-5	2-2	3	3	0	0	7
Raeshun McGregory	Guard	15	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Antonio Sisk	G	13	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jair Horton	F	13	0-3	0-3	0-0	4	1	0	1	0
Markell Petro	Guard	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.1Possessions59.1

110.0Offensive Efficiency91.4

91.4Defensive Efficiency110.0

18.6Net Efficiency-18.6

53.1%Effective FG%42.9%

55.1%True Shooting %48.9%

11.9%Turnover Rate25.3%

42.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%

40.8%3-Point Rate40.8%

1.57Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Grambling won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 59.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.