
Cincinnati
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.5%Cincinnati
68.5%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -6.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -217

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 73
Projected Total151.6
Projected ScoreBYU 79
Team Comparison
61.5MMH Power Index63.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency118.3
97.3Defensive Efficiency106.8
8.0Net Efficiency11.5
5.1Strength of Schedule6.5
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
69.4Tempo70.6
50.6%Effective FG%54.7%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.2%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
30.7%Free Throw Rate35.4%
5.5Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–61.5), offensive efficiency (118.3–105.3), net efficiency (11.5–8.0), strength of schedule (6.5–5.1).
Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.3–106.8), recent form (14.4–-2.2).