Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

44.8%Grambling

55.2%Arkansas-Pine Bluff

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADArkansas-Pine Bluff -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL151.1

MODEL MONEYLINEArkansas-Pine Bluff -123

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Projected Total151.1

Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 76

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricArkansas-Pine Bluff

41.4MMH Power Index38.7

100.7Offensive Efficiency106.4

100.4Defensive Efficiency111.6

0.3Net Efficiency-5.2

-5.7Strength of Schedule-6.0

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency1.3

69.9Tempo72.6

49.2%Effective FG%51.4%

20.9%Turnover Rate18.5%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

42.2%Free Throw Rate37.7%

0.2Average Margin-3.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–38.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–111.6), net efficiency (0.3–-5.2), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.0).

Arkansas-Pine Bluff COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.4–100.7), recent form (1.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (51.4–49.2).

Final

Grambling

81—77

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Grambling by 4 • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATArkansas-Pine Bluff

28-53FG31-63

53.0%FG%49.0%

11-233PT11-24

48.0%3PT%46.0%

14-21FT4-7

67.0%FT%57.0%

29Rebounds33

6Offensive Rebounds11

18Assists20

12Turnovers13

6Steals6

1Blocks2

9Fouls14

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mikale Stevenson	G	36	6-11	1-4	5-6	6	6	2	0	18
Kintavious Dozier	G	27	5-10	5-8	0-0	0	3	1	0	15
Cbo Newton	G	24	4-6	3-5	3-3	0	1	0	0	14
Ernest Ross	Forward	33	6-10	0-0	1-4	3	2	0	0	13
Antwan Burnett	G	32	4-8	1-2	3-6	8	4	2	0	12
PJ Eason	F	30	2-4	0-0	2-2	9	1	0	1	6
Emareyon McDonald	Guard	11	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
James Flippin	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Lou Hutchinson	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Doctor Bradley	G	31	7-12	1-2	2-5	7	5	3	0	17
Dante Sawyer	Guard	23	7-12	0-3	0-0	3	2	0	0	14
Caleb Jones	Guard	26	4-7	3-5	0-0	3	1	1	0	11
Christian Moore	Guard	33	3-11	1-4	0-0	6	9	1	0	7
Kyle Brown	F	22	2-4	2-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	6
Zachary Reinhart	G	16	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Chop Paljor	Guard	9	2-2	2-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	6
Raphael Dumont	Guard	15	2-5	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	4
Quentin Bolton	G	13	0-2	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	2	2
Klemen Vuga	Forward	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Dennis Asoro	F	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7

117.9Offensive Efficiency112.1

112.1Defensive Efficiency117.9

5.8Net Efficiency-5.8

63.2%Effective FG%57.9%

64.3%True Shooting %58.0%

17.4%Turnover Rate19.0%

39.6%Free Throw Rate11.1%

43.4%3-Point Rate38.1%

1.50Assist / Turnover1.54

Game Summary

Grambling won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.