Prairie View A&M

19-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.7%Prairie View A&M

64.3%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -4.0

PROJECTED TOTAL151.5

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -180

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 74

Projected Total151.5

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 78

Team Comparison

Prairie View A&MMetricAlabama A&M

41.6MMH Power Index42.3

105.6Offensive Efficiency105.9

103.9Defensive Efficiency106.6

1.7Net Efficiency-0.7

-9.8Strength of Schedule-6.8

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

73.8Tempo68.0

49.2%Effective FG%49.7%

15.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

27.7%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

42.9%Free Throw Rate45.7%

1.3Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.6), offensive efficiency (105.9–105.6), strength of schedule (-6.8–-9.8), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Prairie View A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.9–106.6), net efficiency (1.7–-0.7), recent form (4.4–3.3).

Final

Prairie View A&M

82—98

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 16 • 84.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Prairie View A&MTEAM STATAlabama A&M

30-63FG31-67

48.0%FG%46.0%

6-173PT9-32

35.0%3PT%28.0%

16-25FT27-32

64.0%FT%84.0%

32Rebounds41

12Offensive Rebounds16

18Assists18

20Turnovers20

11Steals10

—Blocks3

21Fouls23

Player Box Score

Prairie View A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Braelon Bush	G	38	10-15	3-6	5-5	1	2	2	28
Tanahj Pettway	Point Guard	37	8-16	3-7	3-6	7	5	2	22
Zaakir Sawyer	Guard	25	5-8	0-1	2-4	1	3	2	12
Jordan Tillmon	Guard	35	3-9	0-1	3-4	7	3	1	9
Marcel Bryant	F	22	1-7	0-1	2-3	3	1	1	4
Ryan Bolton Jr.	C	8	2-3	0-0	0-1	4	0	0	4
Orlando Horton Jr.	G	22	1-5	0-1	1-2	2	4	2	3
Evan Williams	Forward	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0
Elijah Terry	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AC Bryant	G	29	8-14	4-8	7-8	6	1	2	1	27
Chad Moodie	F	29	7-11	0-0	2-6	10	1	0	0	16
Darius Ford	Guard	15	3-4	1-2	2-2	0	2	2	0	9
Clance Crosby	F	15	2-2	0-0	4-4	3	0	0	0	8
Quincy McGriff	Guard	20	1-5	1-4	4-4	3	1	1	0	7
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	17	2-5	0-3	2-2	4	1	1	2	6
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	22	2-5	0-2	0-0	0	7	4	0	4
Aaron Smith	Guard	4	0-3	0-0	4-4	3	0	0	0	4
Angok Anyang	F	3	1-2	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Jaylen Colon	Guard	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	6	4	0	0	3
London Riley	Guard	11	1-6	1-6	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Joshua Hughley	Guard	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Warren Yeh	Guard	5	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Dylan Mclean	Guard	5	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Saliou Seye	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Ademola Oladipo	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

84.6Possessions84.6

96.9Offensive Efficiency115.8

115.8Defensive Efficiency96.9

-18.9Net Efficiency18.9

52.4%Effective FG%53.0%

54.8%True Shooting %59.6%

24.1%Turnover Rate23.2%

39.7%Free Throw Rate47.8%

27.0%3-Point Rate47.8%

0.90Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 84.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.