
Cincinnati
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.0%Cincinnati
19.0%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -426

Utah
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 79
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreUtah 70
Team Comparison
61.5MMH Power Index43.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency108.8
97.3Defensive Efficiency115.8
8.0Net Efficiency-7.0
5.1Strength of Schedule5.1
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
69.4Tempo68.3
50.6%Effective FG%52.3%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
30.7%Free Throw Rate32.2%
5.5Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–43.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–115.8), net efficiency (8.0–-7.0), recent form (14.4–-16.3).
Utah COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.8–105.3), shooting efficiency (52.3–50.6), ball security (16.7–17.0).