UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.0%UAB

80.0%Tulsa

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulsa -10.1

PROJECTED TOTAL159.3

MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -400

Tulsa

30-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 75

Projected Total159.3

Projected ScoreTulsa 85

Team Comparison

UABMetricTulsa

56.9MMH Power Index64.8

110.5Offensive Efficiency121.1

102.9Defensive Efficiency104.8

7.6Net Efficiency16.3

0.4Strength of Schedule0.0

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3

71.7Tempo70.2

48.8%Effective FG%55.4%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.4%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%

5.4Average Margin11.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–56.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.5), net efficiency (16.3–7.6), recent form (10.3–2.9).

UAB COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–104.8), strength of schedule (0.4–0.0), ball security (12.4–15.4).

Final

UAB

78—66

Tulsa

UAB by 12 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTulsa

29-65FG26-65

45.0%FG%40.0%

9-223PT8-28

41.0%3PT%29.0%

11-16FT6-14

69.0%FT%43.0%

40Rebounds42

12Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists14

6Turnovers10

8Steals3

7Blocks4

13Fouls12

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	34	10-16	2-4	6-7	13	6	2	4	28
Ja'Borri McGhee	G	21	6-10	1-2	1-2	1	1	1	0	14
Tyren Moore	G	19	3-11	3-8	0-0	1	2	1	0	9
Bradley Ezewiro	Forward	28	4-7	0-0	0-1	8	1	3	2	8
Butta Johnson	G	29	1-5	1-1	4-4	4	2	1	1	7
Tony Toney	Guard	29	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	2	0	0	5
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	22	2-7	1-5	0-0	0	2	0	0	5
Christian Coleman	G	18	1-4	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	2

Tulsa

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dwon Odom	Guard	34	7-10	1-2	2-2	8	7	0	2	17
Keaston Willis	Guard	31	6-15	4-10	0-0	2	1	1	0	16
Braeden Carrington	G	14	3-5	3-5	0-1	3	1	0	0	9
Isaiah Barnes	G	33	3-13	0-5	0-2	10	1	0	1	6
Jesaiah McWright	G	24	3-8	0-3	0-0	0	1	2	1	6
Jared Garcia	F	20	1-4	0-0	4-4	5	2	0	0	6
Tyshawn Archie	G	17	2-6	0-3	0-2	2	0	0	0	4
Ian Smikle	F	20	1-3	0-0	0-3	7	1	0	0	2
Matt Reed	F	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

116.1Offensive Efficiency98.2

98.2Defensive Efficiency116.1

17.9Net Efficiency-17.9

51.5%Effective FG%46.2%

53.7%True Shooting %46.1%

9.0%Turnover Rate14.8%

24.6%Free Throw Rate21.5%

33.8%3-Point Rate43.1%

2.67Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

UAB won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.