Vermont logo

Vermont

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.8%Vermont
14.2%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVermont -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL139.3
MODEL MONEYLINEVermont -604
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVermont 75
Projected Total139.3
Projected ScoreBinghamton 64

Team Comparison

53.1MMH Power Index32.4
112.2Offensive Efficiency102.2
104.7Defensive Efficiency112.3
7.5Net Efficiency-10.1
-4.4Strength of Schedule-6.0
12.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
65.4Tempo64.2
54.1%Effective FG%51.3%
14.4%Turnover Rate18.5%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
32.4%Free Throw Rate42.8%
4.9Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vermont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVermont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–102.2), defensive efficiency (104.7–112.3), net efficiency (7.5–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–32.4).
Final
Vermont logo
Vermont
72—75
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
Binghamton by 3 • 67.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VermontTEAM STATBinghamton
22-53FG23-46
42.0%FG%50.0%
8-203PT10-21
40.0%3PT%48.0%
20-26FT19-26
77.0%FT%73.0%
29Rebounds30
6Offensive Rebounds2
8Assists13
9Turnovers11
4Steals6
3Blocks1
19Fouls16

Player Box Score

Vermont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Shamir BoguesGuard349-150-03-444100021
TJ HurleyG364-134-77-831200019
Ileri Ayo-FaleyeForward294-101-52-430020011
Nick FiorilloForward311-41-37-860000010
Sean BlakeG132-41-21-20100006
Jace RoquemoreGuard291-31-20-03100003
Sam AlamutuG201-30-00-09110002
Seth JobaF80-10-10-00001000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wes Peterson Jr.G357-101-23-404200018
Gavin WalshF365-93-44-7132110017
Chris WalkerG373-61-37-871100014
Ben Callahan-GoldForward224-83-62-210200013
Nehemiah BensonForward223-41-10-14200007
Tymu CheneryGuard391-61-32-24300005
Evan AsheG70-10-11-21100001
Jackson BenigniG20-20-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.9Possessions67.9
106.0Offensive Efficiency110.5
110.5Defensive Efficiency106.0
-4.4Net Efficiency4.4
49.1%Effective FG%60.9%
55.1%True Shooting %64.3%
13.2%Turnover Rate16.3%
49.1%Free Throw Rate56.5%
37.7%3-Point Rate45.7%
0.89Assist / Turnover1.18
Game Summary
Binghamton won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 67.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.