Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

73.7%Hofstra

26.3%Elon

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -5.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -280

Elon

14-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 78

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScoreElon 72

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricElon

59.3MMH Power Index45.5

114.0Offensive Efficiency113.0

100.9Defensive Efficiency112.7

13.1Net Efficiency0.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.4

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.7

66.2Tempo69.1

52.2%Effective FG%52.6%

16.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.4%

32.0%Free Throw Rate34.0%

8.7Average Margin0.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–45.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–113.0), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.7), net efficiency (13.1–0.3).

Elon COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.6–52.2), ball security (15.6–16.1).

Final

Hofstra

74—63

Elon

Hofstra by 11 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATElon

28-60FG17-59

47.0%FG%29.0%

8-263PT10-30

31.0%3PT%33.0%

10-17FT19-27

59.0%FT%70.0%

43Rebounds37

9Offensive Rebounds10

13Assists12

7Turnovers4

—Steals4

3Blocks2

18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	BLK	PTS
Cruz Davis	G	37	6-15	3-5	3-4	3	4	0	18
Michael Graham	Forward	30	7-8	0-0	1-1	13	1	1	15
Joshua DeCady	F	20	5-7	2-3	3-6	5	0	0	15
Jean Aranguren	G	39	4-13	0-5	3-6	12	5	1	11
Jaquan Sanders	G	24	2-8	1-7	0-0	1	2	0	5
TJ Gadsden	Guard	19	2-5	1-4	0-0	1	1	0	5
Khalil Farmer	G	17	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	3
Silas Sunday	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	2
KiJan Robinson	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Elon

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tajuan Simpkins	G	29	4-10	3-7	7-8	6	4	0	0	18
Sam Sherry	Forward	34	4-11	2-5	6-8	10	3	0	0	16
Nick Dorn	G	29	3-14	2-10	1-2	3	0	0	0	9
Matt Van Komen	C	21	3-4	0-0	2-3	9	0	0	1	8
Takai Simpkins	G	26	2-15	2-5	1-2	2	1	2	0	7
Drew King	G	28	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	4	0	0	3
Brayden Crump	F	13	0-1	0-1	1-2	0	0	1	0	1
Kendall Campbell	Forward	7	0-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	1	1
Isaac Harrell	F	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9

112.3Offensive Efficiency95.6

95.6Defensive Efficiency112.3

16.7Net Efficiency-16.7

53.3%Effective FG%37.3%

54.4%True Shooting %43.9%

10.6%Turnover Rate6.1%

28.3%Free Throw Rate45.8%

43.3%3-Point Rate50.8%

1.86Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.