
Seattle U
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.1%Seattle U
80.9%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -9.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -424

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeattle U 66
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 76
Team Comparison
51.4MMH Power Index59.8
103.9Offensive Efficiency109.2
96.9Defensive Efficiency99.1
7.0Net Efficiency10.1
-1.7Strength of Schedule2.0
4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
69.4Tempo69.3
50.8%Effective FG%52.1%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.6%
25.1%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
35.2%Free Throw Rate41.0%
4.9Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–51.4), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.9), net efficiency (10.1–7.0), strength of schedule (2.0–-1.7).
Seattle U COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (96.9–99.1), ball security (16.6–17.6).