
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.0%Hofstra
40.0%Campbell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -150

Campbell
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreCampbell 74
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index51.1
114.0Offensive Efficiency110.9
100.9Defensive Efficiency111.0
13.1Net Efficiency-0.1
-2.9Strength of Schedule0.8
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
66.2Tempo70.6
52.2%Effective FG%51.3%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
32.0%Free Throw Rate44.2%
8.7Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–51.1), offensive efficiency (114.0–110.9), defensive efficiency (100.9–111.0), net efficiency (13.1–-0.1).
Campbell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.8–-2.9), free throw rate (44.2–32.0).