Long Island University

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

74.3%Long Island University

25.7%Chicago State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLong Island University -7.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.2

MODEL MONEYLINELong Island University -289

Chicago State

7-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLong Island University 76

Projected Total144.2

Projected ScoreChicago State 69

Team Comparison

Long Island UniversityMetricChicago State

50.2MMH Power Index36.1

107.6Offensive Efficiency99.4

104.8Defensive Efficiency114.9

2.8Net Efficiency-15.5

-1.3Strength of Schedule0.5

4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

68.5Tempo66.2

53.0%Effective FG%45.6%

18.9%Turnover Rate15.8%

33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.1%

34.9%Free Throw Rate30.7%

1.9Average Margin-10.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Long Island University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLong Island University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–36.1), offensive efficiency (107.6–99.4), defensive efficiency (104.8–114.9), net efficiency (2.8–-15.5).

Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-1.3), ball security (15.8–18.9).

Final

Long Island University

67—73

Chicago State

Chicago State by 6 • 71.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Long Island UniversityTEAM STATChicago State

24-64FG22-56

38.0%FG%39.0%

5-213PT7-22

24.0%3PT%32.0%

14-18FT22-31

78.0%FT%71.0%

39Rebounds39

14Offensive Rebounds12

6Assists9

14Turnovers11

5Steals7

5Blocks1

21Fouls18

Player Box Score

Long Island University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malachi Davis	G	43	11-16	4-5	6-8	5	2	1	0	32
Terell Strickland	Guard	40	3-14	0-3	2-3	6	4	1	0	8
Brent Davis	Guard	37	4-15	0-6	0-0	7	0	1	0	8
Jamal Fuller	G	33	1-4	0-2	4-5	4	0	0	0	6
Shadrak Lasu	F	34	2-4	0-1	0-0	8	0	1	5	4
Tre'shawn Sheppard	G	9	1-3	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	0	4
Blake Lander	G	12	1-5	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jalen Lee	G	17	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2

Chicago State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Forrest	G	39	5-10	1-3	8-10	6	1	0	0	19
Gabe Spinelli	G	29	6-15	1-3	3-5	7	1	3	0	16
Noble Crawford	Forward	29	2-7	2-4	3-4	5	2	1	1	9
Matthew Robinson	Guard	34	2-5	1-4	2-4	2	2	2	0	7
Quincy Allen	G	30	1-7	1-6	3-4	6	0	0	0	6
Troy McKoy Jr.	Guard	8	1-4	1-2	3-4	1	1	0	0	6
Dailliss Cox	F	25	2-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	4
Saxby Sunderland	Guard	23	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	4
CJ Delancy	F	8	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

71.2Possessions71.2

94.1Offensive Efficiency102.5

102.5Defensive Efficiency94.1

-8.4Net Efficiency8.4

41.4%Effective FG%45.5%

46.2%True Shooting %51.6%

19.3%Turnover Rate15.8%

28.1%Free Throw Rate55.4%

32.8%3-Point Rate39.3%

0.43Assist / Turnover0.82

Game Summary

Chicago State won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 71.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.