UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.1%UTSA
94.9%North Texas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNorth Texas -20.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.8
MODEL MONEYLINENorth Texas -1861
North Texas logo

North Texas

19-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTSA 62
Projected Total144.8
Projected ScoreNorth Texas 83

Team Comparison

30.5MMH Power Index52.2
99.0Offensive Efficiency104.1
115.0Defensive Efficiency99.1
-16.0Net Efficiency5.0
-1.2Strength of Schedule-1.3
-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency4.8
70.2Tempo68.1
45.9%Effective FG%47.6%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
29.9%Free Throw Rate41.1%
-11.3Average Margin3.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

North Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNorth Texas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–30.5), offensive efficiency (104.1–99.0), defensive efficiency (99.1–115.0), net efficiency (5.0–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-1.3).
Final
UTSA logo
UTSA
54—50
North Texas logo
North Texas
UTSA by 4 • 59.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATNorth Texas
18-44FG18-47
41.0%FG%38.0%
4-193PT3-17
21.0%3PT%18.0%
14-16FT11-13
88.0%FT%85.0%
21Rebounds32
3Offensive Rebounds9
6Assists7
10Turnovers16
12Steals7
4Blocks2
15Fouls16

Player Box Score

UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Raekwon HortonForward408-110-27-742300023
Primo SpearsGuard394-123-74-520200015
Marcus MillenderG384-81-32-223100011
Jonnivius SmithForward301-30-01-23033003
David HermesF101-20-10-01010002
Damari MonsantoGuard360-70-60-08120000
Baboucarr NjieF70-10-00-01001000
North Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Grant NewellF206-60-02-340100014
Brenen LorientF314-70-03-471020011
Atin WrightGuard403-122-72-221100010
Jasper FloydG292-70-22-27440006
Moulaye SissokoForward221-30-02-24000004
Rondel WalkerGuard201-31-20-04010003
Johnathan MassieGuard191-30-10-03000002
Latrell JossellGuard190-60-50-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

59.4Possessions59.4
90.9Offensive Efficiency84.2
84.2Defensive Efficiency90.9
6.7Net Efficiency-6.7
45.5%Effective FG%41.5%
52.3%True Shooting %47.0%
17.1%Turnover Rate26.6%
36.4%Free Throw Rate27.7%
43.2%3-Point Rate36.2%
0.60Assist / Turnover0.44
Game Summary
UTSA won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 59.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.