Texas logo

Texas

21-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.8%Texas
42.2%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas -1.0
PROJECTED TOTAL163.8
MODEL MONEYLINETexas -137
LSU logo

LSU

15-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas 82
Projected Total163.8
Projected ScoreLSU 81

Team Comparison

TexasMetricLSU
61.6MMH Power Index54.2
119.6Offensive Efficiency115.5
110.1Defensive Efficiency111.3
9.5Net Efficiency4.2
5.3Strength of Schedule4.5
-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
69.2Tempo70.5
55.1%Effective FG%53.4%
15.5%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.9%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
44.3%Free Throw Rate41.9%
6.6Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.6–54.2), offensive efficiency (119.6–115.5), defensive efficiency (110.1–111.3), net efficiency (9.5–4.2).
Final
Texas logo
Texas
89—58
LSU logo
LSU
Texas by 31 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATLSU
36-64FG23-51
56.0%FG%45.0%
10-213PT2-15
48.0%3PT%13.0%
7-9FT10-15
78.0%FT%67.0%
35Rebounds23
10Offensive Rebounds4
20Assists5
7Turnovers15
8Steals3
2Blocks2
16Fouls12

Player Box Score

Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tre JohnsonGuard307-132-42-245200018
Tramon MarkG287-122-42-244110018
Kadin ShedrickForward296-111-23-4103300016
Arthur KalumaForward214-82-40-050110010
Devon PryorF214-61-10-06100009
Jordan PopeG193-61-30-12200007
Jayson KentForward132-30-10-01010004
Nic CodieF52-20-00-00000004
Julian LarryGuard231-21-20-01300003
Ze'Rik OnyemaForward110-10-00-01200000
LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan SearsGuard266-121-50-030100013
Robert Miller IIIF244-60-01-14010009
Vyctorius MillerG192-51-34-51000009
Cam CarterGuard312-70-22-34200006
Corey ChestF173-50-00-06100006
Dji BaileyGuard301-30-02-42200004
Trey'Dez GreenForward112-20-00-01000004
Daimion CollinsF161-30-11-20002003
Curtis Givens IIIG191-50-20-00010002
Derek FountainForward51-30-20-00000002
Mike WilliamsG20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2
132.4Offensive Efficiency86.3
86.3Defensive Efficiency132.4
46.1Net Efficiency-46.1
64.1%Effective FG%47.1%
65.2%True Shooting %49.9%
10.7%Turnover Rate21.7%
14.1%Free Throw Rate29.4%
32.8%3-Point Rate29.4%
2.86Assist / Turnover0.33
Game Summary
Texas won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.