Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.3%Binghamton

82.7%UAlbany

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAlbany -11.2

PROJECTED TOTAL137.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUAlbany -478

UAlbany

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 63

Projected Total137.7

Projected ScoreUAlbany 74

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricUAlbany

32.4MMH Power Index41.9

102.2Offensive Efficiency107.9

112.3Defensive Efficiency108.8

-10.1Net Efficiency-0.9

-6.0Strength of Schedule-6.1

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0

64.2Tempo64.3

51.3%Effective FG%52.8%

18.5%Turnover Rate18.6%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %34.3%

42.8%Free Throw Rate25.0%

-6.5Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAlbany HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAlbany holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.9–32.4), offensive efficiency (107.9–102.2), defensive efficiency (108.8–112.3), net efficiency (-0.9–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.1), ball security (18.5–18.6), free throw rate (42.8–25.0).

Final

Binghamton

65—61

UAlbany

Binghamton by 4 • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATUAlbany

22-47FG25-61

47.0%FG%41.0%

5-133PT5-24

38.0%3PT%21.0%

16-21FT6-7

76.0%FT%86.0%

34Rebounds26

8Offensive Rebounds7

11Assists15

19Turnovers12

5Steals13

7Blocks4

10Fouls17

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	30	7-11	0-0	2-3	2	2	1	0	16
Gavin Walsh	F	39	5-10	2-5	3-4	16	1	1	0	15
Tymu Chenery	Guard	39	4-10	2-5	2-2	6	4	0	3	12
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	39	3-5	0-0	5-6	5	3	1	0	11
Chris Walker	G	33	1-5	1-1	4-6	3	0	2	4	7
Ben Callahan-Gold	Forward	11	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Evan Ashe	G	9	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

UAlbany

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Byron Joshua	Guard	36	7-14	1-3	0-0	1	4	1	0	15
Kacper Klaczek	F	33	5-9	2-6	0-0	5	4	4	2	12
Justin Neely	F	26	2-6	0-1	5-5	9	2	1	0	9
DeMarr Langford Jr.	Not Available	31	4-7	0-0	0-0	3	2	2	0	8
Amar'e Marshall	G	20	3-7	1-1	1-2	2	0	1	0	8
Kheni Briggs	G	23	2-8	1-6	0-0	1	2	3	1	5
Amir Lindsey	G	21	2-7	0-5	0-0	3	1	1	0	4
Zacharie Matulu	G	6	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Bautista Giralt	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7

94.6Offensive Efficiency88.8

88.8Defensive Efficiency94.6

5.8Net Efficiency-5.8

52.1%Effective FG%45.1%

57.0%True Shooting %47.4%

28.0%Turnover Rate17.3%

44.7%Free Throw Rate11.5%

27.7%3-Point Rate39.3%

0.58Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.