Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.5%Tulsa
14.5%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -11.4
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -590
Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 84
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreTulane 72

Team Comparison

64.8MMH Power Index44.3
121.1Offensive Efficiency105.3
104.8Defensive Efficiency109.9
16.3Net Efficiency-4.6
0.0Strength of Schedule2.7
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
70.2Tempo68.7
55.4%Effective FG%49.6%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
42.4%Free Throw Rate44.8%
11.5Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (121.1–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.9), net efficiency (16.3–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.0), free throw rate (44.8–42.4).
Final
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
56—59
Tulane logo
Tulane
Tulane by 3 • 64.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulsaTEAM STATTulane
22-58FG21-53
38.0%FG%40.0%
7-253PT7-22
28.0%3PT%32.0%
5-8FT10-15
63.0%FT%67.0%
34Rebounds37
8Offensive Rebounds8
14Assists11
10Turnovers13
8Steals7
3Blocks5
14Fouls12

Player Box Score

Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dwon OdomGuard326-101-20-063300013
Isaiah BarnesG254-102-62-251100012
Jared GarciaF184-80-33-442110011
Keaston WillisGuard313-103-80-02110009
Justin AmadiF152-40-00-04010004
Braeden CarringtonG191-31-30-00111003
Ian SmikleF221-40-00-05101002
Tyshawn ArchieG171-70-20-01200002
Jesaiah McWrightG210-20-10-21300000
Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Rowan BrumbaughG377-145-84-442200023
Asher WoodsG304-121-51-113300010
Gregg Glenn IIIF223-50-02-54501008
Kam WilliamsG363-91-40-06011007
Kaleb BanksF282-60-20-07012004
Percy DanielsC162-30-00-13101004
KJ GreeneG50-00-02-20000002
Mari JordanG180-30-31-26000001
Tyler RinggoldF80-10-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.4Possessions64.4
87.0Offensive Efficiency91.6
91.6Defensive Efficiency87.0
-4.7Net Efficiency4.7
44.0%Effective FG%46.2%
45.3%True Shooting %49.1%
15.7%Turnover Rate20.0%
13.8%Free Throw Rate28.3%
43.1%3-Point Rate41.5%
1.40Assist / Turnover0.85
Game Summary
Tulane won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 64.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.