Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.6%Quinnipiac
69.4%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL141.7
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -227
Siena logo

Siena

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 68
Projected Total141.7
Projected ScoreSiena 74

Team Comparison

51MMH Power Index53.8
106.8Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.1Defensive Efficiency102.2
4.7Net Efficiency7.0
-2.3Strength of Schedule-0.5
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
70.5Tempo64.4
48.9%Effective FG%50.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.8%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
34.1%Free Throw Rate34.9%
3.4Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Siena HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (109.2–106.8), net efficiency (7.0–4.7), strength of schedule (-0.5–-2.3).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–102.2), ball security (15.6–15.8), offensive rebounding (34.1–31.4).
Final
Quinnipiac logo
Quinnipiac
75—84
Siena logo
Siena
Siena by 9 • 79.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATSiena
23-59FG27-64
39.0%FG%42.0%
3-163PT6-25
19.0%3PT%24.0%
26-34FT24-31
76.0%FT%77.0%
44Rebounds34
15Offensive Rebounds10
12Assists15
19Turnovers11
9Steals13
4Blocks9
24Fouls21

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amarri MonroeF369-220-510-1292310028
Khaden BennettG373-91-44-843310011
Doug YoungG122-42-44-541000010
Jaden ZimmermanG233-70-13-30012009
Paul OtienoF322-40-04-48100008
Alexis ReyesForward282-80-20-010120004
Savion LewisGuard241-30-01-25300003
Richie SpringsForward41-10-00-01100002
Ryan MabreyG40-10-00-00000000
Siena
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Justice ShoatsG406-130-110-1336200022
Gavin DotyG388-161-22-362400019
Brendan CoyleF304-92-73-460220013
Reid DucharmeG184-73-62-221200013
Devin BraffordF144-80-21-13120009
Myles WilmothF240-20-16-87216006
Tajae JonesF41-10-00-01000002
Major FreemanG320-80-60-05301000

Advanced Game Stats

79.5Possessions79.5
94.3Offensive Efficiency105.7
105.7Defensive Efficiency94.3
-11.3Net Efficiency11.3
41.5%Effective FG%46.9%
49.9%True Shooting %53.4%
24.0%Turnover Rate13.8%
57.6%Free Throw Rate48.4%
27.1%3-Point Rate39.1%
0.63Assist / Turnover1.36
Game Summary
Siena won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 79.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.