Evansville logo

Evansville

7-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.0%Evansville
98.0%Belmont
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBelmont -26.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEBelmont -4900
Belmont logo

Belmont

26-6
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEvansville 63
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreBelmont 89

Team Comparison

31.6MMH Power Index61.8
98.5Offensive Efficiency118.6
112.4Defensive Efficiency103.7
-13.9Net Efficiency14.9
1.8Strength of Schedule-0.2
-23.0Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
68.0Tempo70.7
50.0%Effective FG%60.7%
18.9%Turnover Rate17.8%
22.2%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
30.8%Free Throw Rate32.7%
-9.5Average Margin10.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Belmont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBelmont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–31.6), offensive efficiency (118.6–98.5), defensive efficiency (103.7–112.4), net efficiency (14.9–-13.9).
Evansville COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-0.2).
Final
Evansville logo
Evansville
80—75
Belmont logo
Belmont
Evansville by 5 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

EvansvilleTEAM STATBelmont
27-65FG28-66
42.0%FG%42.0%
7-203PT13-34
35.0%3PT%38.0%
19-25FT6-10
76.0%FT%60.0%
44Rebounds35
18Offensive Rebounds13
15Assists18
7Turnovers8
5Steals4
5Blocks7
13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Evansville
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Gabriel PozzatoF406-111-59-1031010022
Tayshawn ComerG386-173-54-556000019
Joshua HughesF365-122-52-461100014
Connor TurnbullF256-110-12-264130014
Tanner CuffG382-80-02-413331006
Kaia BerridgeG61-21-20-01000003
Gui TeschGuard171-40-20-06000002
Belmont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jonathan PierreForward336-124-73-441110019
Sam OrmeF276-103-40-042010015
Isaiah WalkerG334-101-31-271210010
Aidan NoyesF203-93-90-06100009
Carter WhittGuard333-100-32-231011008
Tyler LundbladeG263-92-70-00100008
Brigham RogersF213-40-00-25203006
Brody PeeblesGuard70-20-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9
121.4Offensive Efficiency113.8
113.8Defensive Efficiency121.4
7.6Net Efficiency-7.6
46.9%Effective FG%52.3%
52.0%True Shooting %53.0%
10.6%Turnover Rate12.2%
38.5%Free Throw Rate15.2%
30.8%3-Point Rate51.5%
2.14Assist / Turnover2.25
Game Summary
Evansville won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.