Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

90.3%Merrimack

9.7%Rider

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -13.4

PROJECTED TOTAL136.1

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -931

Rider

4-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 75

Projected Total136.1

Projected ScoreRider 61

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricRider

53.7MMH Power Index29.1

106.4Offensive Efficiency96.3

103.2Defensive Efficiency115.3

3.2Net Efficiency-19.0

0.7Strength of Schedule-0.9

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7

64.4Tempo65.9

49.3%Effective FG%43.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate17.1%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %32.8%

39.5%Free Throw Rate31.5%

2.1Average Margin-12.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.4–96.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–115.3), net efficiency (3.2–-19.0).

Rider COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.8–24.7).

Final

Merrimack

66—64

Rider

Merrimack by 2 • 64.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATRider

26-60FG24-53

43.0%FG%45.0%

4-213PT6-13

19.0%3PT%46.0%

10-13FT10-10

77.0%FT%100.0%

24Rebounds37

7Offensive Rebounds10

11Assists15

4Turnovers17

10Steals4

5Blocks1

11Fouls11

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Adam Clark	G	38	10-22	0-3	2-2	5	10	4	0	22
Bryan Etumnu	F	35	4-8	0-2	4-6	7	1	1	3	12
Matt Becht	Guard	34	4-11	2-9	0-0	1	0	1	0	10
Devon Savage	Guard	31	3-9	1-4	2-2	1	0	2	2	9
Sean Trumper	Forward	33	2-3	1-1	1-1	5	0	1	0	6
Tye Dorset	G	14	2-4	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Malik Edmead	G	8	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
David Murray	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Armandas Plintauskas	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Rider

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zion Cruz	G	31	7-12	1-2	0-0	4	1	2	1	15
T.J. Weeks Jr.	Guard	36	4-9	4-7	2-2	4	3	0	0	14
Jay Alvarez	Forward	36	5-11	1-3	0-0	8	1	0	0	11
Tariq Ingraham	F	25	1-3	0-0	6-6	6	4	1	0	8
Stephen Byard	F	15	3-5	0-0	2-2	7	1	0	0	8
Ife West-Ingram	F	10	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Andre Young	Guard	24	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
Flash Burton	G	20	1-5	0-0	0-0	5	3	0	0	2
Zocko Littleton Jr.	Guard	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.0Possessions64.0

103.1Offensive Efficiency100.0

100.0Defensive Efficiency103.1

3.1Net Efficiency-3.1

46.7%Effective FG%50.9%

49.9%True Shooting %55.4%

6.3%Turnover Rate26.3%

21.7%Free Throw Rate18.9%

35.0%3-Point Rate24.5%

2.75Assist / Turnover0.88

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 64.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.