Charleston

21-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

37.5%Charleston

62.5%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -4.9

PROJECTED TOTAL158.0

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -167

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCharleston 77

Projected Total158.0

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 81

Team Comparison

CharlestonMetricWilliam & Mary

53.8MMH Power Index53.8

109.2Offensive Efficiency112.5

106.2Defensive Efficiency105.2

3.0Net Efficiency7.3

1.9Strength of Schedule-1.5

3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

69.1Tempo73.9

50.6%Effective FG%55.3%

15.4%Turnover Rate16.4%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

42.1%Free Throw Rate45.3%

2.0Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.5–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (7.3–3.0), shooting efficiency (55.3–50.6).

Charleston COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-1.5), recent form (3.9–3.5), ball security (15.4–16.4).

Final

Charleston

75—90

William & Mary

William & Mary by 15 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CharlestonTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

26-58FG33-66

45.0%FG%50.0%

9-253PT14-37

36.0%3PT%38.0%

14-21FT10-13

67.0%FT%77.0%

36Rebounds33

13Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists27

12Turnovers5

2Steals6

4Blocks1

15Fouls20

Player Box Score

Charleston

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrin Boyd	Guard	34	8-14	3-7	2-2	1	5	0	1	21
Ante Brzovic	Forward	35	7-11	0-1	6-9	8	1	0	2	20
Justas Stonkus	Guard	32	5-10	3-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	13
CJ Fulton	Guard	36	3-10	2-7	0-0	2	6	2	0	8
Lazar Djokovic	F	29	2-7	0-0	3-4	11	1	0	1	7
Djordje Curcic	G	19	1-5	1-5	2-2	1	0	0	0	5
Elijah Jones	F	12	0-1	0-0	1-4	6	0	0	0	1
Jack Miller	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyle Pulliam	G	22	6-9	2-5	4-4	3	1	0	0	18
Isaiah Mbeng	G	24	5-7	1-3	1-2	1	4	2	0	12
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	32	4-12	2-9	1-1	4	2	3	0	11
Noah Collier	F	5	4-4	2-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	10
Malachi Ndur	Forward	18	3-6	2-4	1-2	1	3	0	0	9
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	15	3-7	1-4	2-2	5	2	0	1	9
Matteus Case	Guard	26	2-5	2-4	1-2	0	6	0	0	7
Chase Lowe	G	18	3-8	0-0	0-0	9	5	0	0	6
Keller Boothby	Forward	21	2-6	1-4	0-0	1	3	1	0	5
Finn Lally	F	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Kyle Frazier	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

111.8Offensive Efficiency134.1

134.1Defensive Efficiency111.8

-22.4Net Efficiency22.4

52.6%Effective FG%60.6%

55.2%True Shooting %62.3%

17.9%Turnover Rate7.4%

36.2%Free Throw Rate19.7%

43.1%3-Point Rate56.1%

1.17Assist / Turnover5.40

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.