North Texas logo

North Texas

19-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.3%North Texas
73.7%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -7.2
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -280
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNorth Texas 70
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreUAB 77

Team Comparison

52.2MMH Power Index56.9
104.1Offensive Efficiency110.5
99.1Defensive Efficiency102.9
5.0Net Efficiency7.6
-1.3Strength of Schedule0.4
4.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
68.1Tempo71.7
47.6%Effective FG%48.8%
16.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
41.1%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.5Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.1), net efficiency (7.6–5.0), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.3).
North Texas COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.1–102.9), recent form (4.8–2.9), offensive rebounding (33.6–32.7).
Final
North Texas logo
North Texas
61—64
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 3 • 63.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North TexasTEAM STATUAB
25-52FG26-58
48.0%FG%45.0%
4-103PT2-13
40.0%3PT%15.0%
7-11FT10-13
64.0%FT%77.0%
29Rebounds31
8Offensive Rebounds12
9Assists12
15Turnovers11
8Steals8
1Blocks7
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

North Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jasper FloydG326-121-22-243300015
Brenen LorientF195-70-02-251010012
Moulaye SissokoForward335-90-00-0111200010
Johnathan MassieGuard274-81-10-24030009
Atin WrightGuard352-72-60-01000006
Grant NewellF242-60-02-23100006
Latrell JossellGuard141-20-01-30300003
Rondel WalkerGuard160-10-10-00000000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF357-120-13-3133310017
Christian ColemanG346-90-01-281120013
Alejandro VasquezGuard274-160-52-212010010
Ja'Borri McGheeG224-60-01-22220009
Tony ToneyGuard352-51-20-02100005
Bradley EzewiroForward111-30-03-42102005
Tyren MooreG201-41-30-02210003
Butta JohnsonG161-30-20-00011002

Advanced Game Stats

63.7Possessions63.7
95.8Offensive Efficiency100.5
100.5Defensive Efficiency95.8
-4.7Net Efficiency4.7
51.9%Effective FG%46.6%
53.3%True Shooting %49.9%
23.4%Turnover Rate17.4%
21.2%Free Throw Rate22.4%
19.2%3-Point Rate22.4%
0.60Assist / Turnover1.09
Game Summary
UAB won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 63.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.