Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

79.4%Miami (OH)

20.6%Central Michigan

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -10.0

PROJECTED TOTAL161.5

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -385

Central Michigan

10-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 86

Projected Total161.5

Projected ScoreCentral Michigan 76

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricCentral Michigan

60.7MMH Power Index44

123.1Offensive Efficiency105.9

103.7Defensive Efficiency111.0

19.4Net Efficiency-5.1

-5.6Strength of Schedule-0.5

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency1.3

72.8Tempo69.3

60.6%Effective FG%52.6%

14.2%Turnover Rate18.3%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

40.1%Free Throw Rate32.9%

14.1Average Margin-3.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–44.0), offensive efficiency (123.1–105.9), defensive efficiency (103.7–111.0), net efficiency (19.4–-5.1).

Central Michigan COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.5–-5.6), offensive rebounding (29.6–26.3).

Final

Miami (OH)

76—70

Central Michigan

Miami (OH) by 6 • 66.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATCentral Michigan

27-55FG25-59

49.0%FG%42.0%

9-233PT6-23

39.0%3PT%26.0%

13-21FT14-21

62.0%FT%67.0%

29Rebounds39

9Offensive Rebounds15

13Assists12

10Turnovers13

5Steals6

4Blocks3

16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	36	7-10	1-3	6-9	4	4	2	1	21
Luke Skaljac	G	19	5-6	3-3	0-1	0	2	0	0	13
Eian Elmer	G	37	4-8	1-2	3-5	9	0	0	1	12
Antwone Woolfolk	F	28	5-7	0-1	0-0	8	2	2	2	10
Brant Byers	G	13	2-7	1-4	2-2	1	0	0	0	7
Kam Craft	G	11	2-7	2-5	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Evan Ipsaro	G	26	1-3	1-2	2-4	2	1	0	0	5
Mekhi Cooper	G	24	1-7	0-3	0-0	1	4	1	0	2
Jackson Kotecki	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Central Michigan

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Damarion Bonds	G	24	6-9	5-8	0-0	3	1	1	1	17
Jakobi Heady	G	34	6-11	1-3	3-4	4	2	0	0	16
Ugnius Jarusevicius	F	30	6-13	0-3	3-8	8	0	0	1	15
Kyler Vanderjagt	G	21	2-6	0-4	4-4	2	0	1	0	8
Shaedon Simpson	G	5	2-2	0-0	2-3	2	0	0	0	6
Anthony Pritchard	Guard	39	2-9	0-1	0-0	7	8	0	0	4
Bryan Ndjonga	F	17	1-2	0-0	2-2	5	0	1	0	4
Cayden Vasko	G	29	0-7	0-4	0-0	6	1	3	1	0
Quentin Heady	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.5Possessions66.5

114.3Offensive Efficiency105.3

105.3Defensive Efficiency114.3

9.0Net Efficiency-9.0

57.3%Effective FG%47.5%

58.5%True Shooting %50.7%

15.2%Turnover Rate19.4%

38.2%Free Throw Rate35.6%

41.8%3-Point Rate39.0%

1.30Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.