South Alabama

21-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

50.1%South Alabama

49.9%Coastal Carolina

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCoastal Carolina -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL146.0

MODEL MONEYLINESouth Alabama -100

Coastal Carolina

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouth Alabama 72

Projected Total146.0

Projected ScoreCoastal Carolina 74

Team Comparison

South AlabamaMetricCoastal Carolina

51.4MMH Power Index46.8

110.3Offensive Efficiency104.0

103.9Defensive Efficiency103.0

6.4Net Efficiency1.0

-3.7Strength of Schedule-1.3

3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.0

67.4Tempo70.5

53.2%Effective FG%48.7%

12.8%Turnover Rate15.3%

24.9%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

39.8%Free Throw Rate33.0%

4.3Average Margin0.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

South Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouth Alabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.4–46.8), offensive efficiency (110.3–104.0), net efficiency (6.4–1.0), recent form (3.4–-2.0).

Coastal Carolina COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–103.9), strength of schedule (-1.3–-3.7), offensive rebounding (27.6–24.9).

Final

South Alabama

84—59

Coastal Carolina

South Alabama by 25 • 57.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South AlabamaTEAM STATCoastal Carolina

33-59FG19-48

56.0%FG%40.0%

15-283PT15-38

54.0%3PT%39.0%

3-3FT6-12

100.0%FT%50.0%

33Rebounds24

8Offensive Rebounds6

19Assists16

5Turnovers9

5Steals4

1Blocks2

12Fouls10

Player Box Score

South Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Myles Corey	G	27	10-13	7-8	0-0	6	1	1	0	27
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	27	7-13	1-1	0-0	6	3	0	0	15
Elijah Ormiston	Forward	25	4-6	1-3	3-3	3	3	3	0	12
Jayden Cooper	G	19	4-7	2-5	0-0	1	1	0	0	10
John Broom	G	30	3-5	1-2	0-0	7	4	0	0	7
Dylan Fasoyiro	Guard	18	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Judah Brown	Forward	20	1-5	1-4	0-0	4	2	1	0	3
Randy Brady	F	9	1-4	1-3	0-0	3	4	0	0	3
Caleb Kizer	F	2	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
JJ Wheat	G	17	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Cantia Rahming	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Coastal Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Battle	G	39	7-14	7-14	2-2	5	2	0	0	23
Henry Abraham	Guard	29	5-10	5-10	0-0	2	4	0	0	15
Rasheed Jones	G	32	4-11	3-9	0-0	1	7	1	0	11
Noah Amenhauser	C	26	2-5	0-0	3-8	9	0	0	2	7
Colin Granger	Center	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Denzel Hines	F	14	0-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	1
Josh Meo	G	31	0-5	0-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Naz Brown	Guard	16	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	2	0	0
Mabor Majak	Center	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.1Possessions57.1

147.1Offensive Efficiency103.3

103.3Defensive Efficiency147.1

43.8Net Efficiency-43.8

68.6%Effective FG%55.2%

69.5%True Shooting %54.9%

8.7%Turnover Rate15.9%

5.1%Free Throw Rate25.0%

47.5%3-Point Rate79.2%

3.80Assist / Turnover1.78

Game Summary

South Alabama won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 57.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.