Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.7%Queens University
68.3%Central Arkansas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCentral Arkansas -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL166.7
MODEL MONEYLINECentral Arkansas -215
Central Arkansas logo

Central Arkansas

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total166.7
Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 87

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index54
118.4Offensive Efficiency113.9
117.0Defensive Efficiency105.2
1.4Net Efficiency8.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-3.9
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency9.8
71.4Tempo71.0
56.6%Effective FG%54.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%
0.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

EVEN MATCHUP

WIN PROBABILITY68.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
5–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNo clear statistical separation
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
63—47
Central Arkansas logo
Central Arkansas
Queens University by 16 • 62.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATCentral Arkansas
21-57FG20-60
37.0%FG%33.0%
14-453PT1-21
31.0%3PT%5.0%
7-10FT6-12
70.0%FT%50.0%
42Rebounds39
12Offensive Rebounds15
15Assists11
11Turnovers13
7Steals4
4Blocks2
14Fouls11

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chris AshbyG289-279-260-020300027
Leo ColimerioForward353-102-64-685210012
Kalib MathewsGuard293-41-20-01411007
Yoav BermanG222-72-71-25201007
Bryce CashGuard312-30-10-03300004
Jaxon PollardF191-30-10-09110002
Nasir MannG120-10-12-21000002
Maban JabrielF81-20-10-03000002
Malcolm WilsonForward160-00-00-05001000
Central Arkansas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brayden FagbemiG385-151-41-123100012
Nehemiah TurnerF286-110-00-372010012
Mike EvbagharuG283-100-21-110010007
Cole McCormickF263-90-60-11300006
Diogo SeixasForward281-50-23-47210005
Jabari West Jr.Forward81-20-11-22000003
Ben FoxGuard311-70-60-01111002
Owen DerhmannG50-00-00-02000000
Ethan ThomasG40-10-00-01000000
Ubong-Abasi EtimC20-00-00-01000000
Connor MancellG20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.3Possessions62.3
101.1Offensive Efficiency75.4
75.4Defensive Efficiency101.1
25.7Net Efficiency-25.7
49.1%Effective FG%34.2%
51.0%True Shooting %35.8%
18.1%Turnover Rate20.4%
17.5%Free Throw Rate20.0%
78.9%3-Point Rate35.0%
1.36Assist / Turnover0.85
Game Summary
Queens University won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 62.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.