Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.7%Tulane
26.3%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -280
UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 78
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScoreUTSA 72

Team Comparison

44.3MMH Power Index30.5
105.3Offensive Efficiency99.0
109.9Defensive Efficiency115.0
-4.6Net Efficiency-16.0
2.7Strength of Schedule-1.2
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
68.7Tempo70.2
49.6%Effective FG%45.9%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.0%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
44.8%Free Throw Rate29.9%
-3.2Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulane HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.3–30.5), offensive efficiency (105.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.9–115.0), net efficiency (-4.6–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.9–22.8).
Final
Tulane logo
Tulane
61—60
UTSA logo
UTSA
Tulane by 1 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATUTSA
19-44FG19-58
43.0%FG%33.0%
5-233PT8-32
22.0%3PT%25.0%
18-21FT14-22
86.0%FT%64.0%
32Rebounds35
5Offensive Rebounds14
9Assists7
16Turnovers10
4Steals8
4Blocks—
16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Asher WoodsG306-82-34-551000018
Rowan BrumbaughG361-80-511-1144000013
Kam WilliamsG353-92-80-07011008
Gregg Glenn IIIF254-80-20-17021008
Kaleb BanksF282-41-31-13201006
KJ GreeneG81-10-02-31110004
Percy DanielsC131-10-00-01000002
Tyler RinggoldF61-20-00-01001002
Mari JordanG170-30-20-01100000
Spencer ElliottF20-00-00-00000000
UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Marcus MillenderG409-195-95-653100028
Raekwon HortonForward403-110-65-631200011
Damari MonsantoGuard333-103-90-03120009
Baboucarr NjieF302-70-23-63120007
Jonnivius SmithForward241-20-01-410000003
Tai'Reon JosephG121-60-30-02100002
David HermesF150-10-10-03000000
Nazar MahmoudG60-20-20-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8
94.1Offensive Efficiency92.6
92.6Defensive Efficiency94.1
1.5Net Efficiency-1.5
48.9%Effective FG%39.7%
56.5%True Shooting %43.8%
24.6%Turnover Rate15.5%
47.7%Free Throw Rate37.9%
52.3%3-Point Rate55.2%
0.56Assist / Turnover0.70
Game Summary
Tulane won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.