William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%William & Mary

42.5%Drexel

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -0.9

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -135

Drexel

17-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 75

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreDrexel 74

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricDrexel

53.8MMH Power Index46.5

112.5Offensive Efficiency103.6

105.2Defensive Efficiency102.4

7.3Net Efficiency1.2

-1.5Strength of Schedule-0.4

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

73.9Tempo65.7

55.3%Effective FG%51.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate19.1%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

45.3%Free Throw Rate32.3%

5.4Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (112.5–103.6), net efficiency (7.3–1.2), recent form (3.5–-4.7).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.4–-1.5), offensive rebounding (30.7–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

66—86

Drexel

Drexel by 20 • 69.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATDrexel

21-53FG31-53

40.0%FG%58.0%

5-263PT12-24

19.0%3PT%50.0%

19-31FT12-22

61.0%FT%55.0%

25Rebounds35

9Offensive Rebounds6

12Assists22

8Turnovers15

8Steals6

—Blocks4

17Fouls20

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	29	5-10	2-6	5-6	3	2	1	17
Kyle Pulliam	G	23	5-5	1-1	4-9	2	1	2	15
Chase Lowe	G	22	5-9	0-0	1-2	7	4	1	11
Malachi Ndur	Forward	23	2-7	0-5	5-6	5	2	0	9
Keller Boothby	Forward	27	3-6	2-5	0-0	2	0	1	8
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	19	1-5	0-4	3-4	1	1	0	5
Matteus Case	Guard	19	0-4	0-1	1-4	1	2	1	1
Isaiah Mbeng	G	15	0-4	0-2	0-0	0	0	2	0
Kyle Frazier	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Miles Hicks	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0
Finn Lally	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0
Luke Kinkade	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Drexel

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Drake	G	32	8-16	3-6	6-8	4	9	1	0	25
Yame Butler	G	28	7-12	2-4	2-5	4	3	1	0	18
Villiam Garcia Adsten	G	29	5-7	1-2	2-5	4	4	1	3	13
Kobe MaGee	G	29	4-4	2-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	10
Cole Hargrove	F	27	3-4	0-0	0-0	8	1	0	0	6
Shane Blakeney	G	20	2-5	2-5	0-0	4	2	1	0	6
Victor Panov	F	24	1-2	1-2	2-4	5	3	0	1	5
Kevon Vanderhorst	G	9	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Clem Edomwonyin	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.6Possessions69.6

94.8Offensive Efficiency123.6

123.6Defensive Efficiency94.8

-28.7Net Efficiency28.7

44.3%Effective FG%69.8%

48.7%True Shooting %67.8%

12.0%Turnover Rate20.7%

58.5%Free Throw Rate41.5%

49.1%3-Point Rate45.3%

1.50Assist / Turnover1.47

Game Summary

Drexel won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 69.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.