Canisius

10-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.2%Canisius

91.8%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -16.4

PROJECTED TOTAL139.9

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1120

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCanisius 62

Projected Total139.9

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 78

Team Comparison

CanisiusMetricQuinnipiac

33.9MMH Power Index51

97.1Offensive Efficiency106.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency102.1

-11.7Net Efficiency4.7

-1.8Strength of Schedule-2.3

-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

64.8Tempo70.5

46.8%Effective FG%48.9%

19.6%Turnover Rate15.6%

29.1%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

32.4%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-7.5Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.8), net efficiency (4.7–-11.7).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-2.3).

Final

Canisius

71—89

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 18 • 73.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CanisiusTEAM STATQuinnipiac

26-51FG33-60

51.0%FG%55.0%

9-233PT8-22

39.0%3PT%36.0%

10-12FT15-16

83.0%FT%94.0%

13Rebounds32

1Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists23

18Turnovers15

10Steals13

2Blocks4

12Fouls12

Player Box Score

Canisius

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Paul McMillan IV	Guard	38	7-17	1-5	8-8	3	1	1	0	23
Tana Kopa	Guard	36	7-11	5-9	0-0	1	3	3	0	19
Dylan Godfrey	F	25	5-9	0-2	2-2	2	3	2	0	12
Cameron Palesse	G	32	4-7	2-4	0-0	2	2	0	1	10
Anthony Benard	G	35	2-3	1-2	0-0	3	3	3	0	5
Gianni Thompson	Forward	25	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	1	2
Evan van der Plas	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Maji David-Maji	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	1	0	0	0
Trevor Augustine	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Nicco DiGiulio	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	32	10-17	2-7	7-7	10	0	2	0	29
Jaden Zimmerman	G	21	5-8	2-3	2-2	2	1	0	0	14
Alexis Reyes	Forward	31	4-9	2-4	2-3	6	5	0	0	12
Paul Otieno	F	28	4-6	0-0	4-4	4	2	2	2	12
Khaden Bennett	G	14	2-4	1-3	0-0	0	2	3	1	5
Savion Lewis	Guard	28	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	8	5	0	4
Richie Springs	Forward	11	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	1	4
Grant Randall	F	10	2-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Ryan Mabrey	G	15	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	3	0	0	3
Doug Young	G	8	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Akintola Akinniyi	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Quinn Guth	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.2Possessions73.2

97.0Offensive Efficiency121.6

121.6Defensive Efficiency97.0

-24.6Net Efficiency24.6

59.8%Effective FG%61.7%

62.6%True Shooting %65.8%

24.4%Turnover Rate20.7%

23.5%Free Throw Rate26.7%

45.1%3-Point Rate36.7%

0.78Assist / Turnover1.53

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 73.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.