
Niagara
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.6%Niagara
92.4%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -16.5
PROJECTED TOTAL133.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -1216

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNiagara 58
Projected Total133.4
Projected ScoreMerrimack 75
Team Comparison
35.8MMH Power Index53.7
100.8Offensive Efficiency106.4
112.4Defensive Efficiency103.2
-11.6Net Efficiency3.2
-0.8Strength of Schedule0.7
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
63.4Tempo64.4
50.9%Effective FG%49.3%
18.8%Turnover Rate14.8%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
27.3%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-7.4Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–35.8), offensive efficiency (106.4–100.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–112.4), net efficiency (3.2–-11.6).
Niagara COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.9–49.3), offensive rebounding (24.9–24.7).