Lindenwood

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.1%Lindenwood

69.9%UT Martin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Martin -6.4

PROJECTED TOTAL141.5

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -232

UT Martin

22-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLindenwood 68

Projected Total141.5

Projected ScoreUT Martin 74

Team Comparison

LindenwoodMetricUT Martin

46.8MMH Power Index49.8

105.5Offensive Efficiency103.8

98.6Defensive Efficiency94.0

6.9Net Efficiency9.8

-6.8Strength of Schedule-4.8

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8

73.7Tempo67.2

50.2%Effective FG%49.5%

18.3%Turnover Rate21.4%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %37.9%

37.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

5.1Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–46.8), defensive efficiency (94.0–98.6), net efficiency (9.8–6.9), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.5–103.8), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.5), ball security (18.3–21.4).

Final

Lindenwood

52—51

UT Martin

Lindenwood by 1 • 65.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LindenwoodTEAM STATUT Martin

16-59FG16-56

27.0%FG%29.0%

7-303PT3-18

23.0%3PT%17.0%

13-19FT16-23

68.0%FT%70.0%

42Rebounds48

13Offensive Rebounds15

8Assists5

10Turnovers13

7Steals6

5Blocks6

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Clayton Jackson	G	30	6-12	3-8	1-2	3	1	1	0	16
Jadis Jones	G	37	2-7	0-0	7-9	11	0	1	0	11
Markeith Browning II	Not Available	27	3-11	1-5	1-1	4	2	0	1	8
Reggie Bass	Guard	25	2-8	2-6	1-1	1	0	3	0	7
Jordan Wildy	Forward	20	2-6	0-0	3-6	2	1	1	2	7
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	3	1	1	1	3
Anias Futrell	G	24	0-9	0-7	0-0	4	3	0	1	0
Aly Tounkara	F	17	0-1	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	0
Jaylon McDaniel	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Colin Ruffin	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tarence Guinyard	G	17	3-9	1-3	4-4	2	0	0	0	11
Afan Trnka	G	30	4-8	0-2	1-2	0	2	1	0	9
Lamine Niang	F	25	3-10	0-1	3-6	11	0	0	5	9
Andrija Bukumirovic	F	30	1-5	1-2	5-7	12	0	1	0	8
Josue Grullon	G	29	1-9	0-5	3-4	5	0	2	0	5
Matija Žužic	G	23	2-4	1-3	0-0	4	0	1	0	5
Filip Radakovic	G	29	1-7	0-2	0-0	6	3	1	0	2
Stefano Faloppa	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Carlos Cortijo	Guard	5	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.0Possessions65.0

80.0Offensive Efficiency78.5

78.5Defensive Efficiency80.0

1.5Net Efficiency-1.5

33.1%Effective FG%31.3%

38.2%True Shooting %38.1%

15.4%Turnover Rate20.0%

32.2%Free Throw Rate41.1%

50.8%3-Point Rate32.1%

0.80Assist / Turnover0.38

Game Summary

Lindenwood won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 65.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.