Princeton logo

Princeton

9-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.4%Princeton
82.6%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -475
Pennsylvania logo

Pennsylvania

18-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 68
Projected Total146.2
Projected ScorePennsylvania 78

Team Comparison

43.5MMH Power Index52.9
105.1Offensive Efficiency108.6
110.3Defensive Efficiency106.4
-5.2Net Efficiency2.2
1.7Strength of Schedule1.9
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
65.2Tempo69.9
50.3%Effective FG%50.9%
16.9%Turnover Rate15.4%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
35.0%Free Throw Rate36.3%
-3.4Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.6–105.1), defensive efficiency (106.4–110.3), net efficiency (2.2–-5.2).
Final
Princeton logo
Princeton
61—59
Pennsylvania logo
Pennsylvania
Princeton by 2 • 64.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PrincetonTEAM STATPennsylvania
20-58FG21-59
34.0%FG%36.0%
9-303PT7-26
30.0%3PT%27.0%
12-13FT10-17
92.0%FT%59.0%
44Rebounds34
12Offensive Rebounds9
11Assists10
13Turnovers6
2Steals9
3Blocks3
14Fouls13

Player Box Score

Princeton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
CJ HappyF205-123-80-080000013
Xaivian LeeG343-131-84-494000011
Jackson HickeG243-71-34-441100011
Caden PierceForward333-81-22-27300009
Blake PetersGuard362-71-52-34111007
Dalen DavisG162-62-40-01000006
Malik AbdullahiF242-50-00-07102004
Jack StantonG80-00-00-00000000
Jack ScottG50-00-00-01100000
Pennsylvania
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Sam BrownG404-133-71-243300012
Nick SpinosoForward235-130-12-451010012
AJ LevineG353-102-51-24240009
Niklas PolonowskiF244-111-80-02000009
George SmithGuard381-31-24-58310007
Augustus GerhartF163-50-01-25100007
Johnnie WalterF191-30-21-21012003
Dylan WilliamsG50-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.7Possessions64.7
94.3Offensive Efficiency91.2
91.2Defensive Efficiency94.3
3.1Net Efficiency-3.1
42.2%Effective FG%41.5%
47.5%True Shooting %44.0%
19.9%Turnover Rate9.4%
22.4%Free Throw Rate28.8%
51.7%3-Point Rate44.1%
0.85Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Princeton won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 64.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.