
Florida Atlantic
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.1%Florida Atlantic
87.9%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -13.3
PROJECTED TOTAL159.3
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -726

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 73
Projected Total159.3
Projected ScoreTulsa 86
Team Comparison
51.6MMH Power Index64.8
110.5Offensive Efficiency121.1
104.4Defensive Efficiency104.8
6.1Net Efficiency16.3
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.0
-2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
71.2Tempo70.2
52.5%Effective FG%55.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.4%
32.9%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
33.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%
4.3Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–51.6), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.5), net efficiency (16.3–6.1), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.9).
Florida Atlantic COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.4–104.8).