Navy logo

Navy

26-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
80.3%Navy
19.7%Lafayette
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL141.3
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -408
Lafayette logo

Lafayette

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNavy 75
Projected Total141.3
Projected ScoreLafayette 66

Team Comparison

56.8MMH Power Index39.6
113.2Offensive Efficiency102.9
97.6Defensive Efficiency110.3
15.6Net Efficiency-7.4
-8.1Strength of Schedule-1.4
16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.4
65.9Tempo67.5
53.7%Effective FG%49.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %25.7%
40.9%Free Throw Rate33.0%
10.3Average Margin-5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–39.6), offensive efficiency (113.2–102.9), defensive efficiency (97.6–110.3), net efficiency (15.6–-7.4).
Lafayette COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.4–-8.1), ball security (15.4–17.1).
Final
Navy logo
Navy
51—61
Lafayette logo
Lafayette
Lafayette by 10 • 67.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NavyTEAM STATLafayette
19-64FG24-51
30.0%FG%47.0%
5-223PT6-23
23.0%3PT%26.0%
8-9FT7-10
89.0%FT%70.0%
33Rebounds40
11Offensive Rebounds6
9Assists12
11Turnovers17
6Steals2
3Blocks4
16Fouls12

Player Box Score

Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin BenigniG357-190-35-553000019
Jordan PennickG305-161-83-452100014
Aidan KehoeC333-100-00-09113006
Jinwoo KimG292-42-20-01200006
Lysander RehnstromGuard122-52-30-00000006
Donovan DraperF240-40-10-07120000
Mike WoodsF200-20-20-04020000
Carnegie JohnsonGuard130-40-30-01000000
Mitch FischerForward40-00-00-00000000
Lafayette
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Caleb WilliamsG367-133-70-032100017
Justin Vander BaanC367-150-31-2133040015
Alex ChaikinG335-102-72-311000014
Mark ButlerG372-40-04-56200008
Folabomi FayemiG51-11-10-01000003
Andrew PhillipsG261-30-10-08200002
TJ BergerG61-30-20-01000002
Ryan PettitG210-20-20-05210000

Advanced Game Stats

67.6Possessions67.6
75.4Offensive Efficiency90.2
90.2Defensive Efficiency75.4
-14.8Net Efficiency14.8
33.6%Effective FG%52.9%
37.3%True Shooting %54.7%
16.1%Turnover Rate25.5%
14.1%Free Throw Rate19.6%
34.4%3-Point Rate45.1%
0.82Assist / Turnover0.71
Game Summary
Lafayette won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 67.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.